Women elected to corporate boards tend to have more experience in risk management and human resources than their male counterparts—a boon for corporate governance, a recent study says.
In fact, according to the research, women board members were likely to bring a half-dozen skills important to decision making that weren’t well-represented on their boards before their arrival: risk management, human resources, sustainability, politics or government, regulatory or compliance, and corporate governance.
These are the findings of Daehyun Kim, assistant professor of accounting at the University of Toronto’s Rotman School of Management, who says he reached his conclusions after reviewing proxy statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission that detailed the skills, qualifications and expertise of incoming directors. Dr. Kim focused on smaller companies, the S&P SmallCap 600, because there is less gender diversity in smaller companies, he says. But according to his research, he says, similar results can be seen on boards of the largest 1,500 public companies in the U.S.
Dr. Kim also found that four of the five least-represented skills on boards were more likely to be possessed by female than male board members: risk management, human resources, sustainability and politics or government.
Dr. Kim doesn’t recommend a quota or minimum proportion of women to serve on boards. Still, he says, looking at the listed skill sets in this way provides a new way to measure the impact of adding women to boards. The additional expertise is a benefit in a boardroom setting.
“The quality of group decision-making is enhanced with diverse opinions,” he says. “Functionally diverse teams are more innovative, set clearer strategies, are more likely to react to competition, and are quicker to adapt to organizational changes.”
By Alina Dizik
Source: Wall Street Journal
It’s well-known that women are underrepresented in political leadership. Now, a new study highlights how we frame this problem can impact public attitudes. The research reveals that framing the gender disparity as “men’s overrepresentation” rather than “women’s underrepresentation” can provoke stronger emotional reactions and motivate action—at least among women.
Diversity, equity and inclusion policies going into 2025 are up for considerable review by CFOs who are risk-cognizant. Corporate America’s recent pullback on DEI policies is only the beginning of what’s to come and is the result of misguided onsets of corporate DEI, the politicization of the workplace and executive ignorance, according to multiple sources interviewed by CFO.com.
A new survey shows that in health care, financial services, and consumer products, companies develop products and services that overlook the needs of women. This is a significant missed opportunity, given that women manage $32 trillion in global spending and are projected to control 75% of discretionary spending.
