Women elected to corporate boards tend to have more experience in risk management and human resources than their male counterparts—a boon for corporate governance, a recent study says.
In fact, according to the research, women board members were likely to bring a half-dozen skills important to decision making that weren’t well-represented on their boards before their arrival: risk management, human resources, sustainability, politics or government, regulatory or compliance, and corporate governance.
These are the findings of Daehyun Kim, assistant professor of accounting at the University of Toronto’s Rotman School of Management, who says he reached his conclusions after reviewing proxy statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission that detailed the skills, qualifications and expertise of incoming directors. Dr. Kim focused on smaller companies, the S&P SmallCap 600, because there is less gender diversity in smaller companies, he says. But according to his research, he says, similar results can be seen on boards of the largest 1,500 public companies in the U.S.
Dr. Kim also found that four of the five least-represented skills on boards were more likely to be possessed by female than male board members: risk management, human resources, sustainability and politics or government.
Dr. Kim doesn’t recommend a quota or minimum proportion of women to serve on boards. Still, he says, looking at the listed skill sets in this way provides a new way to measure the impact of adding women to boards. The additional expertise is a benefit in a boardroom setting.
“The quality of group decision-making is enhanced with diverse opinions,” he says. “Functionally diverse teams are more innovative, set clearer strategies, are more likely to react to competition, and are quicker to adapt to organizational changes.”
By Alina Dizik
Source: Wall Street Journal
It’s a persistent myth: if a company recruits enough employees from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups, a sufficient number will, over time, rise through the organization to create a diverse culture at all levels. But that is not happening.
The script at BIO this year could not have been more clear: Progress on diversity is being made, but more work needs to be done. Yet still, an undercurrent of biotech’s all-boys brand-of-old tugged at the heels of efforts to bolster those long-excluded from positions of authority.
Another vital antidote to the labor shortage is fixing the care economy, made up of people who provide paid and unpaid care. (See “Overview of the Care Economy.”) Within the care economy, two related and somewhat hidden issues are crucial to the long-term health of the US labor market.