You’ve seen the headlines about the lack of female leadership, the challenges women overcome to reach the C-suite and the dwindling numbers of women at the top.
Some companies are testing out structured mentoring, empowerment programs and ambition summits to fix the problem and correct gender imbalances. But other experts say this may not be a bottom-up problem as much as a top-down one, which begins with a startling lack of diversity on company boards.
A majority of companies in the S&P 500 have at least one woman on their boards, but only 25% have two, according to a recent study from PwC.
In order for boards to appoint more female CEOs, there first have to be more female board members to vote for them, says Anna Beninger, senior director of research and corporate engagement partner at Catalyst, a non-profit studying women and work.
“It’s complicated when you look at the board, but we have to appreciate the incredible influence that they have in determining who is going to be that CEO-level role, and notably, if they stay and how successful they are,” she says.
There’s a direct line between diversity on boards and diversity in the C-suite, says Paula Loop, a leader at PwC’s governance insights center.
“If you have more diversity on the board, it’ll help the talent management oversight role that the board is responsible for,” she says. “You’ll start to see more push around gender diversity.”
Women may be the most vocal advocates for diversity sitting on those boards, according to the PwC study. Women were “notably more likely” than men to consider different factors that could help recruit more minorities and women.
Term limits could also help increase board turnover and free up seats for younger, more diverse candidates, Beninger says.
Loop serves on the board of PwC, her first board appointment. She credits the power of her network with connecting her to the position.
“I think the challenge is that you do have some very talented female executives that would do well on a board, but one of the key enablers to finding a board position is your network,” she says. “If you don’t have a robust or deep personal network that you can leverage to get onto a board, that’ll be a hurdle you have to figure out how to get over.”
By Julia Carpenter
Source: CNNMoney (New York)
An estimated one in seven people in the UK are neurodivergent, yet many struggle to get into jobs or progress in employment. For example, just three in ten of autistic people are in employment, with many of these jobs unstable or below their skill level. In the engineering sector, the call to recognise and harness the unique capabilities of neurodivergent talent has never been more pressing.
A desire from younger workers to earn high salaries early in their careers is a desire based on needs and not wants, data suggests. When asked about the main reasons for compensation increases, 31% said to pay for all their bills and expenses and 25% said to save money for the future.
At a recent training I was facilitating, I invited people to ask me anything anonymously using polling technology. While the questions always give me great insight into where people are struggling with issues of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI), this question seemed more universal: “What do I do if my manager is not inclusive?”
