Sector News

Would Ian Read keep his AZ deal promises? U.K. panel eyes new rules to enforce them

September 15, 2014
Life sciences
Remember all those industrial and investment promises Pfizer made when it was trying to snag AstraZeneca earlier this year? The body that polices U.K. dealmaking is eyeing new rules that would give it more power to enforce such promises, should Pfizer–or another company–come calling in the future.
 
The set of proposed changes to the U.K. Takeover Panel’s Takeover Code, announced Monday, would help the panel distinguish between a suitor’s broad intentions and its specific undertakings, the Financial Times reports. It would also help the panel apply stricter requirements to promises that fall into the latter category.
 
The request for new rules follows Pfizer’s failed $120 billion bid for London-based rival AstraZeneca, which came with a set of commitments from CEO Ian Read, meant to reassure the public about his company’s good intentions. Among them were vows to keep at least 20% of the combined group’s total R&D workforce in AZ’s home country and finish off construction of the U.K. company’s planned R&D hub in Cambridge.
 
But shareholders and other concerned members of the public questioned whether the U.K. Takeover Panel could hold Read to his word. With industry-watchers speculating that another Pfizer play for AZ could be on the horizon, sooner rather than later may be the best time to get those questions resolved.
 
Under the proposed rules, the panel would require any party that’s made deal-related undertakings to deliver periodic progress reports. The panel could also require companies to appoint an independent supervisor to make sure they follow through with their commitments, the FT notes.
 
If the governmental and public outcry triggered by Pfizer’s offer wasn’t enough to deter similar-minded bidders, additional scrutiny from the Takeover Panel could be, Jones Day partner Leon Ferera told the paper.
 
“Now that the panel has proposed these changes, parties to an offer will need to think hard about whether they want to give firm commitments,” he said. “There will be a number of additional obligations and costs that they will have to bear.”
 
But as the panel works on finalizing the changes–which will be complete by the end of the year, it hopes–deals for U.K. companies could keep on rolling in. So far, mounting U.S. political pressure hasn’t been enough to stem the tax-inversion tide, and Pfizer said last week that it’s bent on a tax-advantaged pickup of its own–whether or not AstraZeneca wants to be a part of it. 
 
By Carly Helfand
 

comments closed

Related News

October 10, 2021

Nutraceutical giants’ partnerships inject life back into industry at Vitafoods

Life sciences

Some of industry’s biggest players are joining forces to bring cost-effective yet scientifically backed offerings to the nutraceuticals market. Co-creation is reinvigorating supplement innovation, pairing together companies’ diverse expertise, sales networks and clinical trial investments.

October 10, 2021

Pilot launch complete: GlaxoSmithKline’s malaria shot scores WHO backing for wider rollout in Africa

Life sciences

GlaxoSmithKline has spent many years developing and testing its world-first malaria vaccine, but even after a positive recommendation from European regulators in 2015, the shot still isn’t widely deployed. That’s set to change with the World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) blessing for the vaccine.

October 10, 2021

Henrietta Lacks’ estate sues Thermo Fisher for continued sale of HeLa cells without family consent

Life sciences

A sample of Henrietta Lacks’ tissue was taken from her cervix without her consent while she was undergoing cancer treatment at Johns Hopkins Hospital in 1951. Her cells have subsequently been used to develop the polio vaccine, HPV vaccines and gene-mapping techniques and continue to be sold for research purposes by Thermo Fisher Scientific.

Send this to a friend