Sector News

Tiny drugmakers top list of most profitable, but Shire and Gilead are there, too

May 8, 2015
Life sciences
Who are the most profitable companies in healthcare? Drug companies, with 7 out of 10 slots on a ranking by profit margin. Who are the most profitable drug companies? You might scratch your heads at all but a couple of names.
 
First, we have to take the top-ranked company with a grain of salt. AMAG Pharmaceuticals, a small drugmaker that built its fortunes on an anemia drug called Feraheme, came in first place in the ranking of healthcare companies by profit margin, compiled by Motley Fool. For 2014, AMAG’s profit margin amounted to 109%. That’s because of a one-time tax benefit that pushed net income to $143 million on just $124 million in sales. Needless to say, not a repeatable feat. AMAG’s most recent claim to fame was its $1.25 billion buyout of bankrupt Lumara Health last fall.
 
Next in line? PDL BioPharma, which typically ranks near the top of pharma, margin-wise. Its 2014 margin amounted to about 66%, Motley Fool says. It’s not a typical drugmaker, though; it makes most of its money on royalties, with 71% of 2014 revenue coming from drugs licensed to Roche’s Genentech unit.
 
The third-ranking company is more interesting: It, too, is a tiny business, relatively speaking, with just $57.4 million in first-quarter revenue. But Enanta Pharmaceuticals’ success depends on a very big disease–hepatitis C–and its revenue right now depends on AbbVie, which owes Enanta milestones and royalties on the newly approved cocktail Viekira Pak. For instance, $50 million of Enanta’s Q1 revenue was a milestone payment for European approval of that treatment. Its 2014 profit margin amounted to 65%.
 
Four other small drugmakers are on the list–POZEN, at a 61% margin; the generics maker Taro Pharmaceutical, at 52%; ANI Pharmaceuticals with 51%; and Vanda Pharmaceuticals at 40%.
 
In fact, the only two pharma companies of any size whose margins hit such heights were these: Shire, which specializes in rare diseases, gastrointestinal drugs and ADHD meds, and is aiming for $10 billion in sales by 2020. And Gilead Sciences, with its hugely successful hep C franchise and its stable of high-performing HIV drugs. Shire’s margin amounted to 56% last year, while Gilead’s stood at 48%.
 
By Tracy Staton
 

comments closed

Related News

June 24, 2022

Echosens and Novo Nordisk announce partnership to increase awareness and advance early diagnosis of NASH

Life sciences

Echosens, a high-technology company offering liver diagnostic solutions, and Novo Nordisk A/S, a leading global healthcare company, announced a partnership to advance early diagnosis of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and increase awareness of the disease among patients, healthcare providers and other stakeholders.

June 24, 2022

argenx receives positive CHMP opinion for Efgartigimod for the treatment of adult patients with Generalized Myasthenia Gravis in Europe

Life sciences

Positive opinion based on Phase 3 ADAPT trial showing efgartigimod provided clinically meaningful improvements in strength and quality of life measures. If approved, efgartigimod will be the first neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) blocker for the treatment of adults in Europe living with rare neuromuscular disease generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG).

June 24, 2022

Galapagos finally takes M&A plunge, spending $251M for 2 biotechs in CAR-T push

Life sciences

Galapagos CEO Paul Stoffels, M.D., has finally taken the plunge on M&A. The newly minted chief executive has signed not one but two deals in an attempt to right the ship, bringing two small biotechs aboard for a combined 239 million euros ($251.4 million).