Sector News

Tiny drugmakers top list of most profitable, but Shire and Gilead are there, too

May 8, 2015
Life sciences
Who are the most profitable companies in healthcare? Drug companies, with 7 out of 10 slots on a ranking by profit margin. Who are the most profitable drug companies? You might scratch your heads at all but a couple of names.
 
First, we have to take the top-ranked company with a grain of salt. AMAG Pharmaceuticals, a small drugmaker that built its fortunes on an anemia drug called Feraheme, came in first place in the ranking of healthcare companies by profit margin, compiled by Motley Fool. For 2014, AMAG’s profit margin amounted to 109%. That’s because of a one-time tax benefit that pushed net income to $143 million on just $124 million in sales. Needless to say, not a repeatable feat. AMAG’s most recent claim to fame was its $1.25 billion buyout of bankrupt Lumara Health last fall.
 
Next in line? PDL BioPharma, which typically ranks near the top of pharma, margin-wise. Its 2014 margin amounted to about 66%, Motley Fool says. It’s not a typical drugmaker, though; it makes most of its money on royalties, with 71% of 2014 revenue coming from drugs licensed to Roche’s Genentech unit.
 
The third-ranking company is more interesting: It, too, is a tiny business, relatively speaking, with just $57.4 million in first-quarter revenue. But Enanta Pharmaceuticals’ success depends on a very big disease–hepatitis C–and its revenue right now depends on AbbVie, which owes Enanta milestones and royalties on the newly approved cocktail Viekira Pak. For instance, $50 million of Enanta’s Q1 revenue was a milestone payment for European approval of that treatment. Its 2014 profit margin amounted to 65%.
 
Four other small drugmakers are on the list–POZEN, at a 61% margin; the generics maker Taro Pharmaceutical, at 52%; ANI Pharmaceuticals with 51%; and Vanda Pharmaceuticals at 40%.
 
In fact, the only two pharma companies of any size whose margins hit such heights were these: Shire, which specializes in rare diseases, gastrointestinal drugs and ADHD meds, and is aiming for $10 billion in sales by 2020. And Gilead Sciences, with its hugely successful hep C franchise and its stable of high-performing HIV drugs. Shire’s margin amounted to 56% last year, while Gilead’s stood at 48%.
 
By Tracy Staton
 

comments closed

Related News

April 20, 2024

CureVac and MD Anderson Cancer Center partner to develop new cancer vaccines

Life sciences

CureVac and the University of Texas’s MD Anderson Cancer Center have announced a co-development and licensing agreement to develop novel messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA)-based cancer vaccines. The strategic collaboration will focus on the development of differentiated cancer vaccine candidates in selected haematological and solid tumour indications with high unmet medical needs.

April 20, 2024

FUJIFILM plans $1.2 billion investment in major US manufacturing facility

Life sciences

FUJIFILM Corporation is planning to invest $1.2 billion to expand the planned FUJIFILM Diosynth Biotechnologies manufacturing facility in Holly Springs, North Carolina, US. This news follows the organisation’s announcement of a $2 billion investment in the facility in March 2021. This additional financial boost totals the investment to over $3.2 billion, FUJIFILM confirmed.

April 20, 2024

Sanofi cuts staff in Belgium as early-stage research dwindles

Life sciences

Sanofi’s global restructuring and downsizing is now fully underway, with layoffs stretching to the company’s Belgian offices. Belgian newspaper De Tijd reports that 67 employees have been laid off at a site in Ghent and 32 jobs are on the chopping block at Sanofi’s Belgium HQ in Diegem.

How can we help you?

We're easy to reach