Worried about emerging diseases, pharma has increasingly teamed with governments and nonprofits to work on vaccines to combat them. But in a new interview, Sanofi Pasteur’s chief quality officer, Anders Vinther, says drugmakers need help tackling another lurking challenge: global regulatory entanglements.
Speaking with The Pharma Letter (sub. req.), Vinther said a simple change to vaccine manufacturing lines can take up to five years to implement, thanks to the variety of different regulatory considerations in more than 100 countries. That fragmented regulatory system makes it difficult for drugmakers to quickly respond to changing vaccine needs around the world, he added.
Furthering the problem is that only a few large vaccinemakers operate globally, and that it takes about two years to produce some vaccine batches. Together, those factors can lead to shortages when unexpected demand crops up or if one company develops manufacturing problems, according to Vinther.
Vinther’s statements come as Sanofi Pasteur struggles to keep up with yellow fever vaccine demand and a global shortage moves into the U.S. Late last month, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said supplies are set to run out this summer as the drugmaker shifts production to a new facility, expected to open next year.
Sanofi and a few other players around the world produce yellow fever vaccines, but they have had trouble meeting demand as recent outbreaks have spawned emergency vaccination campaigns.
Manufacturing complexities are just one challenge the highly concentrated vaccine industry faces. Obtaining funding for research on diseases that pose a future risk but aren’t certain to develop into a viable market for profit-driven drugmakers is also difficult. To address that hurdle, several pharma companies have partnered with the Gates Foundation and governments to finance early-stage R&D for vaccines against potential threats.
Dubbed the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, the group formed in January with support from GlaxoSmithKline, Merck & Co., Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Sanofi and Takeda, plus $460 million in commitments from nonprofits and governments. First on the list for R&D work are the MERS-CoV, Lassa and Nipah viruses.
Seeking to contribute to the effort, GlaxoSmithKline established an R&D facility outside of Washington, D.C., where its scientists will conduct research against emerging diseases. The company wanted to “walk the talk” after years of discussions between stakeholders about emerging disease risks, former CEO Andrew Witty said at an opening ceremony.
By Eric Sagonowsky
Source: Fierce Pharma
The companies will explore opportunities to apply Flagship’s innovative bioplatforms – an ecosystem that currently comprises 41 companies – to scientific challenges in disease areas within cardiometabolic and rare diseases and initiate research programmes based on these.
BD is expanding its long-running partnership with the blood collection company Babson Diagnostics. The two companies have been working together since 2019 on a device that can gather small volumes of blood from the capillaries in the fingertip without requiring any specialized training, and beginning with a focus on supporting primary care in retail settings.
Wednesday, Australian biotech CSL said (PDF) the regulatory review of its $11.7 billion acquisition of Switzerland’s Vifor Pharma will take “a few more months,” suggesting it won’t be able to close the transaction by June 2022 as previously expected.
