Sector News

Takeda feels the sting of NICE's CDF takeover

August 12, 2016
Life sciences

Cancer drug makers have worried about the future of their products in England since its cost watchdog announced would take the reins of the Cancer Drugs Fund. Now, an appraisal of Takeda’s Adcetris shows they may have had good reason to.

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) said Wednesday in draft guidance that it wouldn’t recommend the med for the treatment of refractory systemic anaplastic lymphoma or relapsed or refractory CD30+ Hodgkin’s lymphoma, citing “immature and limited” evidence of the med’s clinical effectiveness.

It also pointed to the med’s price–Adcetris can cost between £69,000 and £87,000 per patient per course–and noted that the agency didn’t have the evidence needed to show that Adcetris represented a good value for that kind of money.

“We understand that this preliminary decision will be disappointing to patients who could be eligible for treatment,” Carole Longson, director of NICE’s Center for Health Technology Evaluation, said in a statement. “But we need to make sure that the drugs and treatments we look at will benefit patients and be a cost effective use of NHS resources.”

While the guidance won’t affect patients who are already on the drug–their treatment can continue without change to the funding arrangements that are already in place–if it holds, it could affect sales of Adcetris moving forward.

Even so, Takeda chose not to put forward a case for the product’s inclusion in the new CDF. That’s because of Adcetris’ tiny patient population–it sees about 50 to 60 eligible patients per year. The Japanese pharma was unclear on what further information it could gather on the drug through data collection going forward, it told NICE.

Pharma hasn’t been shy about sharing its opinions on NICE’s move to take over the beleaguered fund, which provided funding for several therapies the watchdogs deemed too pricey for routine NHS use. The head of global oncology for Eisai–whose Lenvima was axed from CDF’s covered list–said the switch creates “an utterly disgraceful situation,” while Roche recently argued that NICE’s methodology perpetuates “ongoing anxiety around the availability of existing and new cancer medicines” for patients.

By Carly Helfand

Source: Fierce Pharma

comments closed

Related News

May 21, 2022

As monkeypox cases emerge in US and Europe, Bavarian Nordic inks vaccine order

Life sciences

A monkeypox outbreak is emerging in the U.S. and Europe, and at least one country is amping up countermeasure preparedness. Bavarian Nordic has secured a contract with an unnamed European country to supply its smallpox vaccine, called Imvanex in Europe, in response to the emergence of monkeypox cases, the Danish company said Thursday.

May 21, 2022

Moderna chairman Afeyan defends hiring practices after CFO debacle: report

Life sciences

Moderna’s recent chief financial officer debacle—in which Jorge Gomez departed on his second day on the job—raised questions about the company’s hiring process given its rush to global biopharma prominence. The most obvious one: How was it possible for Gomez to be hired when he was under investigation by his previous employer, Dentsply Sirona of Charlotte, N.C.

May 21, 2022

Merck to pay up to $1.4B in cancer deal with Kelun, but details are scarce

Life sciences

Merck & Co. is plucking a cancer project from the branch of Chinese-based Kelun Pharmaceutical for up to $1.4 billion, but details from the New Jersey-based Big Pharma have been hard to come by. The deal, first disclosed Monday on the Shenzhen stock exchange, has Merck handing over $47 million in upfront cash in exchange for ex-China rights to a “macromolecular tumor project.”