Sector News

Sorry, Pfizer. GlaxoSmithKline doesn't want your OTC unit either

March 26, 2018
Life sciences

Earlier this week, Reckitt Benckiser gave GlaxoSmithKline an open shot at Pfizer’s up-for-sale OTC unit by withdrawing from deal talks. But that’s a shot GSK won’t be taking.

The British drugmaker, considered the leader in the race for the division, said Friday that it would drop out, too.

“While we will continue to review opportunities that may accelerate our strategy, they must meet our criteria for returns and not compromise our priorities for capital allocation,” CEO Emma Walmsley said in a statement.

The move has some shareholders breathing a sigh of relief. One group of investors has worried about a big deal cutting into the company’s dividend, especially because Walmsley had refused to confirm that dividends would remain untouched if Glaxo went after the Pfizer asset. And another group never approved of GSK’s focus on low-margin consumer health in the first place.

GSK’s move increases the likelihood that Pfizer, which expects to decide this year on the unit’s fate, will hang on to the portfolio. It’s “tough to dance without a partner,” Credit Suisse analyst Vamil Divan, M.D., wrote in a Friday note to clients, noting that the company could also choose to spin the unit off.

The all-but-certain lack of a sale is an outcome at least one analyst predicted before GSK’s announcement Friday.

“There’s a low probability that they execute the transaction,” Suntrust analyst John Boris wrote in a note seen by Bloomberg, adding that, thanks to store-brand generic alternatives and online sales from retailers such as Amazon, the “brand cachet” of OTC products such as Pfizer’s Advil or Centrum “is being eroded.”

“The margins are there but the question is, are you going to be able to grow the franchise?” he wrote.

Pfizer’s price tag wasn’t low, either. The New York drugmaker had reportedly been attempting to drum up more than $20 billion, a figure that may have scared off former suitors Johnson & Johnson and Nestle, in addition to GSK and RB.

By Carly Helfand

Source: Fierce Pharma

comments closed

Related News

January 15, 2022

Colorcon Ventures invests in AI-Driven bio-simulation company VeriSIM Life

Life sciences

Colorcon Ventures, the corporate venture fund of Colorcon Inc., has invested in VeriSIM Life, a San Francisco-based startup with a digital bio-simulation platform that accelerates drug development and reduces animal testing.

January 15, 2022

A record number of biotechs are going public. Here’s how they’re performing.

Life sciences

Initial public offerings have fueled biotech’s boom. Keep track of them as they happen with this database. Which biotechs create value over time, and which fail? What types of companies are generating the best returns? Who are their top investors? Biopharma Dive is tracking these details in the database which will be updated regularly.

January 15, 2022

Sanofi cuts ties with Sangamo, sharpening focus on ‘off-the-shelf’ cell therapy

Life sciences

Sanofi has ended a long-running alliance with Sangamo Therapeutics to develop genetic medicines for inherited blood disorders, among them an experimental sickle cell disease therapy that is in early clinical testing.
The two have been developing complex, personalized treatments, led by a sickle cell drug known as SAR445136. But Sanofi is now more interested in off-the-shelf approaches, which are meant to be more convenient.

Send this to a friend