Sector News

PhRMA throws controversy-ridden Valeant under the bus

October 23, 2015
Life sciences

Pharma industry trade group PhRMA generally protects its own amid controversy. But now, it’s put up a statement on its website criticizing a drugmaker that’s surrounded by plenty.

Thursday, the group likened the Canadian drugmaker Valeant Pharmaceuticals to much-maligned Turing Pharmaceuticals, noting that its strategy is “more reflective of a hedge fund than an innovative biopharmaceutical company.”

Unlike Valeant, the innovators “have R&D at the core–and the numbers to prove it,” the post says. The Quebec-based pharma, on the other hand, has made its way by serially acquiring companies and squeezing out costs, investing on average less than 3% of its total revenue on R&D.

It’s the latest effort by the group to distance itself from the drug price uproar coming from lawmakers, presidential candidates and–in the case of Valeant–federal prosecutors. Earlier this week, short seller Citron Research likened Valeant to Enron and claimed it used its relationship with specialty pharmacies to inflate its top line; that relationship was one of the subjects of a pair of federal subpoenas the company last week announced it had received.

Turing, which drew ire when it last month hiked the price of Daraprim by more than 5000%, felt a similar burn from the trade organization when PhRMA put out a tweet stating that the company didn’t represent the values of its member companies.

Meanwhile, Valeant said Monday that it’s looking to sock more money into R&D. It’ll also look to hive off its neurology and “other drugs” unit, which has been subject to some of its biggest price hikes, and it’ll pursue fewer–if any–transactions “focused on mispriced products,” CEO J. Michael Pearson said on a conference call.

But those assurances didn’t do much to sooth investors’ worries when Citron’s “phantom sales” allegations hit. After plunging 19% Wednesday, Valeant’s share price dropped another 7.4%, Bloomberg points out, with one BMO Capital Markets analyst downgrading the stock.

By Carly Helfand

Source: Fierce Pharma

comments closed

Related News

November 28, 2021

Founder-led biotech is making space for ideas—and diverse leaders—where it didn’t exist before

Life sciences

Decades ago, the founder-led biotech was rare and considered the tougher path to follow. Now there is a trend of founder-led biotechs that have risen in prominence in recent years, going from startup to well known with lightning speed. Scientists-turned C-suite occupants know their technology inside out. They’ve got credibility both at the bench working with their research teams and in the boardrooms selling their future products.

November 28, 2021

Pfizer to become $100B behemoth next year thanks to COVID-19 drug and vaccine: analyst

Life sciences

Pfizer’s revenue could reach $101.3 billion in 2022, with major contributions coming from the company’s BioNTech-partnered COVID vaccine and an antiviral therapeutic that has shown stellar clinical data, SVB Leerink analyst Geoffrey Porges projected in a Monday note to clients.

November 28, 2021

GlaxoSmithKline takes aim at sick pay access inequities with microgrant program and new campaign

Life sciences

In a survey commissioned by GlaxoSmithKline’s consumer health division of 2,000 working people in the U.S., almost 70% admitted to clocking in while sick, often because they couldn’t afford to lose a day’s pay. Black and Latina women were 10% more likely than white women to shun taking sick time for fear of fallout from their boss, according to the company’s 2021 Temperature Check Report.

Send this to a friend