Sector News

GSK chief sees cheap money spurring ‘poor choices’ in pharma M&A

May 13, 2015
Life sciences
As pharma companies jump left and right at dealmaking opportunities, GlaxoSmithKline CEO Andrew Witty is scratching his head.
 
The way he sees it, superlow interest rates–in other words, cheap money–are spurring companies to make “poor choices” in the M&A arena, including “stretched” valuations, he told the Financial Times–and he’s not about to get involved.
 
“We’re not going to get drawn into the idea that just because money is cheap we can do anything,” he told the paper.
 
Since the start of last year, biopharma has struck a whopping $460 billion worth of deals, the FT notes, and Witty thinks that signals some buyers won’t end up seeing the returns they were hoping for when they shelled out on hot drug prospects.
 
“Either only a few will make it and you get really good rewards, or lots will make it, in which case competition is going to bring the price down. In either scenario, the model that says everybody succeeds and everyone gets maximum returns doesn’t work,” he said.
 
Of course, that’s not to say Glaxo has stayed completely out of the deal boom. It’s hard to forget the multibillion-dollar asset swap it inked with Swiss rival Novartis last year, which, at a combined $23.05 billion, ranked third on pharma’s list of 2014 transactions.
 
But like his current attitude toward M&A, that pact signaled that Witty–and Glaxo, by extension–was marching to the beat of his own drummer. The agreement set up a GSK-controlled OTC joint venture and sent the company’s cancer meds–which many drugmakers count among their prized possessions–across the continent in exchange for most of the Basel-based drugmaker’s vaccine assets.
 
“It’s as if GSK is playing string music just as the market is getting into drum and bass,” one healthcare analyst told the Times.
 
The thing is, the British pharma giant will now be relying on two traditionally low-margin businesses–vaccines and consumer health–to stay afloat, with aging respiratory behemoth Advair taking a huge toll on the company’s pharma unit. And while Witty says sales volume can make up for lower prices, some industry watchers aren’t convinced.
 
“Mr. Witty is running out of time,” Stephen Bailey, a fund manager at Liontrust Asset Management, told Bloomberg earlier this month. “He’s either got to deliver in the next 12 months or step aside.”
 
By Carly Helfand
 

comments closed

Related News

May 15, 2022

Novo Nordisk and Flagship Pioneering announce a strategic collaboration to create a portfolio of transformational medicines

Life sciences

The companies will explore opportunities to apply Flagship’s innovative bioplatforms – an ecosystem that currently comprises 41 companies – to scientific challenges in disease areas within cardiometabolic and rare diseases and initiate research programmes based on these.

May 15, 2022

BD, Babson set sights on bringing simple blood collection into the home

Life sciences

BD is expanding its long-running partnership with the blood collection company Babson Diagnostics. The two companies have been working together since 2019 on a device that can gather small volumes of blood from the capillaries in the fingertip without requiring any specialized training, and beginning with a focus on supporting primary care in retail settings.

May 15, 2022

CSL’s $11.7B Vifor buy, 2021’s biggest biopharma M&A deal, hits antitrust delay

Life sciences

Wednesday, Australian biotech CSL said (PDF) the regulatory review of its $11.7 billion acquisition of Switzerland’s Vifor Pharma will take “a few more months,” suggesting it won’t be able to close the transaction by June 2022 as previously expected.