The good news about drug pricing pressure, according to Merck & Co. CEO Ken Frazier? It won’t get much worse.
Merck, along with its biopharma peers, has faced increasing price resistance since some high-profile controversies in 2015 triggered a public outcry. As the industrywide controversy continued—and politicians, including President Donald Trump, vowed to crack down on pharma—the company published a “transparency report” last year disclosing 40.9% rebates overall, up from 27.3% in 2010.
But Frazier sees no sign that payers or politicians will tighten the clamps further in 2018.
“While we are going to continue to see incremental pressure on pricing, I don’t see anything from the public agencies or through the private payers, any kind of significant jump in that pressure,” he said Monday during a Q&A-style session at the annual J.P. Morgan Healthcare Conference.
Beyond the price-hike controversies, payers have been zeroing in on some competitive drug categories, including diabetes, to wring big discounts out of drugmakers in return for formulary exclusives or better coverage. And as many critics have blasted pharma for raising their prices, the industry has sought to argue that middlemen are playing a role in growing prices.
Merck’s “transparency report” highlighted its yearly increases at a portfolio level. For 2016, the company increased its U.S. prices by 9.6% on average before discounts. Payer negotiations brought the net price hikes to a 5.5% increase on average, according to the report.
There’s one area where Merck will definitely see less pressure in 2018 than it did last year, Frazier said, and that’s taxes, thanks to the Republican tax plan. Merck’s overall tax rate “will be lower with this legislation compared to what it would have been without the legislation.”
“It doesn’t really change our capital allocation strategy per se,” Frazier said.
But it does give Merck increased flexibility for dealmaking, he noted. In the wake of tax reform, many industry watchers have predicted that 2018 will bring a new wave of M&A. For two years, as dealmakers awaited results from the U.S. election and then on tax cuts, the industry has been largely quiet on big M&A moves. Now, according to Frazier, that could change.
Asked whether he believes the industry is poised for consolidation, Frazier said he believes the conditions are right, but cautioned that Merck “will continue to be focused on innovation, not consolidation, as our strategy.”
By Eric Sagonowsky
Source: Fierce Pharma
Colorcon Ventures, the corporate venture fund of Colorcon Inc., has invested in VeriSIM Life, a San Francisco-based startup with a digital bio-simulation platform that accelerates drug development and reduces animal testing.
Initial public offerings have fueled biotech’s boom. Keep track of them as they happen with this database. Which biotechs create value over time, and which fail? What types of companies are generating the best returns? Who are their top investors? Biopharma Dive is tracking these details in the database which will be updated regularly.
Sanofi has ended a long-running alliance with Sangamo Therapeutics to develop genetic medicines for inherited blood disorders, among them an experimental sickle cell disease therapy that is in early clinical testing.
The two have been developing complex, personalized treatments, led by a sickle cell drug known as SAR445136. But Sanofi is now more interested in off-the-shelf approaches, which are meant to be more convenient.