Sector News

AbbVie puts $2B on the table for I-Mab cancer collab as biotech nabs $418M raise

September 7, 2020
Life sciences

It’s a good day for Shanghai-based I-Mab, which has penned a $2 billion upfront-biobucks R&D deal with AbbVie while also nabbing $418 million from investors.

First up, the AbbVie deal, which is made up of a $180 million upfront payment and a $20 million milestone payment—up to $2 billion all-in—with $1.74 billion of that figure roughly half split between commercial royalties and R&D biobucks.

That cash focuses on lemzoparlimab, I-Mab’s anti-CD47 monoclonal antibody, which AbbVie is also eyeing as a potential combination med with its blood cancer drug Venclexta.

There are few details on specific targets of the drug, with the China biotech saying simply it has potential for “the treatment of multiple cancers” and recently finished off a phase 1, which I-Mab said showed its early-stage drug was safe.

As a target, anti-CD47 got a lot of attention this year when Gilead Sciences bought out Forty Seven for $4.9 billion in March, giving the pharma the midphase anti-CD47 antibody magrolimab that delivered data that impressed investors late last year.

Evidence suggests drugging CD47 could neutralize a key mechanism tumors use to avoid being attacked by the immune system, thereby unlocking opportunities for combination therapies in multiple indications.

In December last year, Forty Seven went some way toward validating this approach by revealing 50% or more of the myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia patients who took magrolimab and Celgene’s Vidaza had a complete response. This seemingly got Gilead interested.

AbbVie will now hope to be able to replicate the same results, and nabs a global license for the drug (except in I-Mab’s native China).

“Cancer is the second-leading cause of death globally and the need for novel cancer therapies has never been more acute. The addition of I-Mab’s novel CD47 programs complements our global clinical strategy in hematology and immuno-oncology,” said Thomas Hudson, M.D., senior vice president of R&D and chief scientific officer at AbbVie.

“We have been impressed with what I-Mab has been able to accomplish in research and clinical development and we look forward to working together to make a meaningful difference in the lives of millions of patients globally.”

There’s also an option for AbbVie to take on two more bispecific versions of the drug, paying out a minimum of $500 million each, bringing the deal up to $3 billion, should it also press go on these under terms they both agree to.

As if that weren’t enough good news, I-Mab also separately announced that it had bagged $418 million in a private placement from a number of investors led by Hillhouse Capital Group, with significant participation by GIC, and also including certain other leading Asian and U.S. biotech investment funds such as Avidity Partners, OrbiMed, Octagon Capital Advisors and others.

By: Ben Adams

Source: Fierce Biotech

comments closed

Related News

November 28, 2021

Founder-led biotech is making space for ideas—and diverse leaders—where it didn’t exist before

Life sciences

Decades ago, the founder-led biotech was rare and considered the tougher path to follow. Now there is a trend of founder-led biotechs that have risen in prominence in recent years, going from startup to well known with lightning speed. Scientists-turned C-suite occupants know their technology inside out. They’ve got credibility both at the bench working with their research teams and in the boardrooms selling their future products.

November 28, 2021

Pfizer to become $100B behemoth next year thanks to COVID-19 drug and vaccine: analyst

Life sciences

Pfizer’s revenue could reach $101.3 billion in 2022, with major contributions coming from the company’s BioNTech-partnered COVID vaccine and an antiviral therapeutic that has shown stellar clinical data, SVB Leerink analyst Geoffrey Porges projected in a Monday note to clients.

November 28, 2021

GlaxoSmithKline takes aim at sick pay access inequities with microgrant program and new campaign

Life sciences

In a survey commissioned by GlaxoSmithKline’s consumer health division of 2,000 working people in the U.S., almost 70% admitted to clocking in while sick, often because they couldn’t afford to lose a day’s pay. Black and Latina women were 10% more likely than white women to shun taking sick time for fear of fallout from their boss, according to the company’s 2021 Temperature Check Report.

Send this to a friend