Sector News

Westlake goes hostile after Axiall rejects second, $3.1-billion bid

April 5, 2016
Energy & Chemical Value Chain

Axiall’s board of directors has turned down a second, $3.1-billion acquisition bid from Westlake Chemical. Westlake has responded by formally ending negotiations and asking Axiall shareholders to elect a new board selected by Westlake.

The new bid, submitted on 29 March, offered $23.35 ($14.00 in cash and 0.1967 of a Westlake share) for each share of Axiall, 17% above the $2.9-billion bid submitted 29 January.

“Given the Axiall board’s unrealistic expectations and entrenched position, we feel we have no choice but to proceed today with a proxy contest to replace Axiall’s directors with new, independent, and highly qualified directors who are willing to evaluate all options in accordance with their fiduciary duties,” says Westlake president and CEO Albert Chao in a letter sent to Axiall shareholders on 4 April. Westlake named its slate 16 February.

In his letter, Chao notes that Axiall shares were trading at $9.60 the day before Westlake’s initial offer. “[S]ince then, nothing has changed in Axiall’s outlook that would lead to a standalone valuation anywhere near the value of our proposal,” he says. “In addition, Axiall has consistently overestimated the earnings power of its business and has a track record of failing to deliver on its operational and strategic objectives.”

Axiall shares opened at $22.68 on 4 April, quickly rose to $23.14, and fell back to $22.66 by late morning.

Axiall says it had been “actively engaged in discussions with Westlake” since 8 March to see if the company “was willing to make a revised proposal that appropriately reflects the high quality of Axiall’s assets, the significant growth potential of its business, and the powerful synergies available in a combination.” In a letter rejecting Westlake’s second bid, Axiall CEO Timothy Mann says the board was “surprised and disappointed” that Westlake had revised its bid before “the completion” of the discussions.

“In particular, we struggle to understand why you would not engage in any meaningful discussion of the very substantial synergies between the two companies prior to your revised proposal especially since we have told you we believe the synergies could be as high as $270 million annually,” the letter says. “This is $210 million more than the $60 million in synergies underlying your proposal. In addition, as there is a substantial stock component to your proposal, we would need the opportunity to conduct due diligence with respect to Westlake’s business if we were to move forward,” Mann says.

By Clay Boswell

Source: Chemical Week

comments closed

Related News

April 26, 2024

CIECH Group will change its name to Qemetica in June

Energy & Chemical Value Chain

We are closing the chapter of the Chemicals Import Export Headquarters, and opening a new chapter under the name of Qemetica – a chemical group driving many industries on all continents. Therefore, the change of name is also accompanied by the adoption of the key goals of the business strategy for the next 6 years. – says Kamil Majczak, President of the Management Board.

April 26, 2024

Neste annouces first success in processing pyrolysis oil from discarded tires

Energy & Chemical Value Chain

In its efforts to advance chemical recycling, Neste has successfully conducted its first processing trial run with a new challenging raw material, liquefied discarded tires. In the processing run, Neste produced high-quality raw material for new plastics and chemicals.

April 26, 2024

Sika opens synthetic fibers production facility in Peru

Energy & Chemical Value Chain

Sika is opening a state-of-the-art facility in Lima, Peru, to produce synthetic macro fibers, and expanding the rollout of a product range with great growth potential in Latin America. With this innovative technology, Sika is further strengthening its position as a leading supplier to the mining industry and a strong partner for infrastructure projects.

How can we help you?

We're easy to reach