Sector News

Dow and DuPont reviewing post-merger split plans

June 29, 2017
Chemical Value Chain

Dow Chemical and DuPont announced on 29 June that they have engaged McKinsey & Co. to assist in reviewing the composition of the three companies they intend to spin-off following the closure of their merger.

In a joint statement, the companies said both boards support a “comprehensive portfolio review for DowDuPont.” The review is “intended to assess current business facts and leverage the knowledge gained over the past year and a half to capture any material value-enhancing opportunities in preparation for the intended creation of three industry-leading companies.” The companies reaffirmed their expectation to close the merger by the end of August, with the separation into three independent, pure-play companies also expected to occur within the original timeline of 18 months post-close. These companies will include a materials science company, an agriculture company, and a specialty products company.

Wednesday’s announcement comes less than a month after activist hedge fund Third Point (New York), led by investor Dan Loeb, called for the companies to shift several “high-multiple” businesses from their planned materials science spin-off into the planned specialty products company. Third Point argues that the change could create $20 billion in additional value by shifting high-multiple businesses into more focused companies that it thinks will trade at premium multiples. Third Point says the planned specialty products spin-off could be further split into as many as four public companies.

“Our review will provide an in-depth look at the portfolio mix and alignment across divisions to ensure we capitalize on all value-enhancing opportunities. The output of the review will be an immediate focus for the DowDuPont Board following merger close,” says Alexander Cutler, lead director of DuPont and former chairman and CEO of Eaton Corporation.

Jeff Fettig, lead director of Dow, and chairman and CEO of Whirlpool, adds that the collective board is committed to ensuring that each of the intended companies “will have clear focus, an appropriate capital structure, a distinct and compelling investment thesis, scale advantages, and focused investments in innovation to better deliver superior solutions and choices for customers.

Additional details about the nature of the review were not disclosed.

By Rebecca Coons

Source: Chemical Week

Related News

October 17, 2020

Evonik and Siemens test plant to produce chemicals from carbon dioxide

Chemical Value Chain

Evonik and Siemens have commissioned a pilot plant that uses microorganisms to convert water and carbon dioxide into specialty chemicals. The pilot plant has been built at Evonik’s site in […]

October 17, 2020

Wearable IT devices – Dyeing process gives textiles electronic properties

Chemical Value Chain

Whether in fitness, medicine or in the entertainment industry, IT devices worn on the body, such as smart watches, are becoming increasingly popular. Such wearables benefit from the input device […]

October 17, 2020

New recycling facility in Europe will recycle plastic repeatedly

Chemical Value Chain

Technology company Loop Industries and environmental services company SUEZ have announced that they will build a recycling facility in Europe using Loop’s technology which can recycle plastic repeatedly without quality […]

Send this to a friend