Sector News

What's holding up the Shire-Baxalta deal? One word: Taxes

January 8, 2016
Life sciences

Shire and Baxalta both reportedly want to make a tie-up happen. So what’s taking so long?

According to the Financial Times, the potential deal now hinges on Shire’s ability to put cash in the mix without triggering a hefty tax bill. And the Dublin drugmaker won’t be proceeding until it’s “highly confident” in the advice it receives, the newspaper’s sources say.

Shire initially approached its target with an all-stock bid–one that would have avoided violating U.S. rules that forbid spinoffs–such as Baxalta, which separated from parent Baxter this summer–from funneling tax-free cash to shareholders. But Baxalta wasn’t interested in an all-stock deal, and now, Shire is working with advisers to make sure adding cash to its offer won’t create a liability.

If it does, Shire could always argue against it in court, where it would have to prove Baxter wasn’t planning to use the spinoff for tax avoidance all along, Bernstein analyst Ronny Gal pointed out in a note to shareholders. On that front, Shire has a couple points going for it. “Baxter didn’t know that Shire was interested, and from its incorporation documents it is clear that Baxalta does not want to be bought,” he wrote.

Before it takes that risk, though, Shire likely needs some clarity on a couple items, Gal figures. For one, it needs to make sure there’s no “aberrant email somewhere suggesting that internally Baxter thought the Baxalta spin-out may lead to its profitable acquisition.” And it also probably wants to know “the exact magnitude of its tax exposure,” as well as whose rights and responsibilities are whose if the IRS comes calling.

If Shire can get that all figured out, CEO Flemming Ornskov may wind up sealing the deal he’s been chasing for months. As Bloomberg recently reported, Shire is offering to fork over between $46.50 and $48 per share for the Illinois pharma–a price that values the company at around $32 billion.

Not everyone is as gung-ho about the potential acquisition as Ornskov, though. Gal, for one, has pointed out that several companies have new-age hemophilia treatments coming up the pipeline that’ll threaten Baxalta’s top dogs. “Success of alternative approaches could devastate” Baxalta’s business, he wrote last month, predicting that 40% or so could take a direct hit.

By Carly Helfand

Source: Fierce Pharma

comments closed

Related News

April 20, 2024

CureVac and MD Anderson Cancer Center partner to develop new cancer vaccines

Life sciences

CureVac and the University of Texas’s MD Anderson Cancer Center have announced a co-development and licensing agreement to develop novel messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA)-based cancer vaccines. The strategic collaboration will focus on the development of differentiated cancer vaccine candidates in selected haematological and solid tumour indications with high unmet medical needs.

April 20, 2024

FUJIFILM plans $1.2 billion investment in major US manufacturing facility

Life sciences

FUJIFILM Corporation is planning to invest $1.2 billion to expand the planned FUJIFILM Diosynth Biotechnologies manufacturing facility in Holly Springs, North Carolina, US. This news follows the organisation’s announcement of a $2 billion investment in the facility in March 2021. This additional financial boost totals the investment to over $3.2 billion, FUJIFILM confirmed.

April 20, 2024

Sanofi cuts staff in Belgium as early-stage research dwindles

Life sciences

Sanofi’s global restructuring and downsizing is now fully underway, with layoffs stretching to the company’s Belgian offices. Belgian newspaper De Tijd reports that 67 employees have been laid off at a site in Ghent and 32 jobs are on the chopping block at Sanofi’s Belgium HQ in Diegem.

How can we help you?

We're easy to reach