Sector News

What patients want: FDA lists top preference-sensitive areas in medtech

May 3, 2019
Life sciences

The FDA is polling the industry and the public for ideas on where the agency should focus when it comes to addressing patient preferences for medical devices, to help build out its new list of priorities that could impact the structure of premarket clinical studies, risk-benefit assessments and postmarket reviews.

Awareness of patient preferences can also be applied in the design of the device itself, of course, and the FDA hopes to identify the key areas where deeper knowledge would have the largest impacts—such as in how patients may value the benefits and risks of a certain technology or treatment differently from healthcare professionals and caregivers.

“Patients are the experts in living with their disease or condition, the outcomes that are most important to them, and how they weigh benefits and risks,” Jeff Shuren, director of the FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health, said in an agency statement.

“Through better collection and understanding of information that matters to patients, we can ensure our evaluation throughout the lifecycle of a medical device includes a better reflection of the patient experience,” Shuren added. There may also be areas were population-level differences in perspective could be better understood.

To start, the agency has published an initial list of priority areas culled from previous public input the FDA has received through workshops and other avenues. It includes descriptions of patient values in diagnosis and treatment, as well as relevant clinical endpoints for specific populations.

It also lists preference-sensitive areas organized by medical specialty—for example, the tradeoffs between risks and benefits when operating diagnostics at the point-of-care compared to other venues or whether incremental increases in cancer survival always outweigh the risks of device-related toxicity.

The FDA has also opened a docket for public comments on whether any changes should be made to the list, and is seeking information on existing studies in the field to help it address the issue.

“By asking patients, industry members and researchers to provide comments and feedback on this list, we’re working to ensure that the valuable insights from patients continue to inform the agency’s decisions and understanding,” Shuren said.

By Conor Hale

Source: Fierce Biotech

comments closed

Related News

May 21, 2022

As monkeypox cases emerge in US and Europe, Bavarian Nordic inks vaccine order

Life sciences

A monkeypox outbreak is emerging in the U.S. and Europe, and at least one country is amping up countermeasure preparedness. Bavarian Nordic has secured a contract with an unnamed European country to supply its smallpox vaccine, called Imvanex in Europe, in response to the emergence of monkeypox cases, the Danish company said Thursday.

May 21, 2022

Moderna chairman Afeyan defends hiring practices after CFO debacle: report

Life sciences

Moderna’s recent chief financial officer debacle—in which Jorge Gomez departed on his second day on the job—raised questions about the company’s hiring process given its rush to global biopharma prominence. The most obvious one: How was it possible for Gomez to be hired when he was under investigation by his previous employer, Dentsply Sirona of Charlotte, N.C.

May 21, 2022

Merck to pay up to $1.4B in cancer deal with Kelun, but details are scarce

Life sciences

Merck & Co. is plucking a cancer project from the branch of Chinese-based Kelun Pharmaceutical for up to $1.4 billion, but details from the New Jersey-based Big Pharma have been hard to come by. The deal, first disclosed Monday on the Shenzhen stock exchange, has Merck handing over $47 million in upfront cash in exchange for ex-China rights to a “macromolecular tumor project.”