Sector News

Valeant denies bypassing eye-device maker Iconlabs in M&A bid for lens tech

August 18, 2017
Life sciences

After a disastrous two years for Valeant, the company faces a lawsuit alleging it “engaged in willful ignorance” to bypass a would-be partner and acquire intraocular lens technology from a third-party licensee. But Valeant has hit back with its own counterclaim.

California’s Iconlabs alleges that the ailing drugmaker’s Bausch & Lomb unit received two of Icon’s lenses for testing back in 2011, but later terminated their contract, saying it wasn’t interested in purchasing the technology. But B&L’s subsidiary in Turkey pursued the technology through a local company that had licensed it, according to the lawsuit.

Valeant denies the allegations, and last week, it filed a countersuit saying as much—alleging, meanwhile, that Iconlabs’ partner is at fault.

Icon alleges B&L Saglik, a Turkish subsidiary, signed an agreement with Anadolu Tip, an Icon partner in the country, to acquire the lens technology. In doing so, it engaged in “willful ignorance” or “negligence,” turning a blind eye to the fact that Icon and Anadolu Tip had an agreement prohibiting such a transfer, according to the device company’s suit.

Nonetheless, B&L acquired Icon’s technology through that route, according to the lawsuit. Icon now alleges it’s out $170 million in lost profits, a representative said via email. Among the allegations in Icon’s suit are breach of contract, unjust enrichment, misappropriation of trade secrets, intentional interference with contractual relations and more. Valeant acquired B&L in 2013.

The Icon suit further alleges that the money paid for the assets didn’t go to the Turkish company, but rather to offshore accounts set up by its officers and directors.

A Valeant spokesperson said the company and its B&L subsidiary “deny these allegations, and we believe we acted properly with respect to the purchase of this intraocular lens technology.”

The lawsuit and Valeant’s response come as the Laval, Quebec-based company works to recover from two years of devastating setbacks that have wiped 90% off its share price. After allegedly shady dealings with specialty pharmacy Philidor came to light back in 2015, things went south for the drugmaker. Pricing controversy, Capitol Hill hearings, government investigations and lawsuits—plus a mountain of debt—haven’t helped the company.

Meanwhile, hedge fund billionaire John Paulson recently took up a board position at the embattled company, just after another high-profile investor, Bill Ackman, called it quits.

By Eric Sagonowsky

Source: Fierce Pharma

comments closed

Related News

January 29, 2023

Colorcon, Inc. signs Put agreement with intent to acquire controlled atmosphere packaging specialist Airnov Healthcare Packaging

Life sciences

Airnov provides critical healthcare industries with high-quality, controlled atmosphere packaging, to protect their products from moisture and oxygen. The business has manufacturing facilities in the USA, France, China and India and employs around 700 people.

January 29, 2023

Takeda pledges up to $1.13B for rights to Hutchmed’s cancer drug fruquintinib outside of China

Life sciences

Takeda of Japan has partnered with Hong Kong-based Hutchmed, gaining the commercial rights to colorectal cancer drug fruquintinib outside of China for $400 million up front, plus $730 million in potential milestone payments. Takeda also will help develop fruquintinib, which can be applied to subtypes of refractory metastatic colorectal cancer, regardless of biomarker status, the companies said.

January 29, 2023

Vir taps Bayer dealmaker Marianne De Backer as its next CEO

Life sciences

On April 3, Scangos, who’s been chief executive officer at Vir since the start of 2017, will hand over the reins to Marianne De Backer, Ph.D. De Backer comes over from Bayer, where she currently heads up pharmaceutical strategy, business development and licensing. Alongside her CEO appointment, De Backer is set to join Vir’s board of directors, the company said Wednesday.

How can we help you?

We're easy to reach