Sector News

U.K. investor Woodford calls again for breakup of 'complicated' GSK

January 11, 2016
Life sciences

In October, high-profile U.K. fund manager Neil Woodford advocated for a four-way break-up of GlaxoSmithKline, a company he said could unlock “significant shareholder value” by splitting apart. And he hasn’t quit championing that idea.

As Woodford told the BBC Friday, GSK is so complicated that it runs itself “like four FTSE 100 companies bolted together”–and, on top of that, the pharma giant doesn’t “do a particularly good job of managing all of the constituent parts.”

Instead, he said, he’d like to see the company “focus on certain activities in the portfolio and do them better than they have done in the past, demerge the bits they haven’t managed particularly well and let other people who specialize in those activities run those businesses.”

It’s basically Big Pharma’s slim-down mantra to a tee. Over the last few years, companies have been hiving off or trading away non-core assets to home in on what they do best; Glaxo itself was part of a multi-billion-dollar asset swap last year with Novartis that sent its oncology meds to Switzerland, bolstered its position in the vaccines market and set up an industry-leading consumer health joint venture.

But the way Woodford sees it, that’s not enough. The sum of Glaxo’s parts is still worth more than its current share price, he told the news service.

If it’s a large-scale restructuring he wants, though, he’ll have to take it up with CEO Andrew Witty, who made it clear on the company’s Q3 conference call that the drugmaker had thoroughly considered–and decided against–any divestment moves. Glaxo has already weighed an established products sale, he said, but “that just wasn’t a good economic transaction to do.”

And as far as a spinoff of surging HIV drugs business ViiV Healthcare–it’s not happening, the CEO said, echoing the decision GSK made last May after weighing a divestment for months.

“We took the decision not to separate it because we believed we were the best owners,” he said. “… And I think we’ve been vindicated since.”

By Carly Helfand

Source: Fierce Pharma

comments closed

Related News

May 15, 2022

Novo Nordisk and Flagship Pioneering announce a strategic collaboration to create a portfolio of transformational medicines

Life sciences

The companies will explore opportunities to apply Flagship’s innovative bioplatforms – an ecosystem that currently comprises 41 companies – to scientific challenges in disease areas within cardiometabolic and rare diseases and initiate research programmes based on these.

May 15, 2022

BD, Babson set sights on bringing simple blood collection into the home

Life sciences

BD is expanding its long-running partnership with the blood collection company Babson Diagnostics. The two companies have been working together since 2019 on a device that can gather small volumes of blood from the capillaries in the fingertip without requiring any specialized training, and beginning with a focus on supporting primary care in retail settings.

May 15, 2022

CSL’s $11.7B Vifor buy, 2021’s biggest biopharma M&A deal, hits antitrust delay

Life sciences

Wednesday, Australian biotech CSL said (PDF) the regulatory review of its $11.7 billion acquisition of Switzerland’s Vifor Pharma will take “a few more months,” suggesting it won’t be able to close the transaction by June 2022 as previously expected.