Sector News

Trump's pushing GOP to put 'competitive bidding' on drugs in healthcare bill

March 21, 2017
Life sciences

How would a “competitive bidding process” for drugs work? We may soon find out, if President Donald Trump gets his way with the Republican healthcare bill.

Trump assured supporters at a Monday rally that drug prices are still a top priority for him—and to back that up, said he’s working quickly to get a drug-bidding measure into the current repeal-and-replace bill.

If that doesn’t work, “we are going to have it right after,” Trump promised the crowd in Louisville, Kentucky.

Pushing for more competition in pharma isn’t an unfamiliar refrain from the president, who highlighted his desire for bidding during an infamous pre-inauguration press conference. At that appearance, Trump famously said pharma is “getting away with murder.”

Monday, he followed up with more sound bites. U.S. drug costs are “outrageous, many times higher than in some countries in Europe and elsewhere,” he said.

“Somebody is getting very rich,” he continued. “We are going to bring it down, we are going to have a great competitive bidding process.”

Trump has occasionally softened his tone since the January press conference, but he continues to maintain that drug prices are way too high. And he often leaves industry watchers clamoring for details about proposals to bolster competition—competitive bidding included.

Speaking in January about then President-elect Trump’s calls for a bidding system, Pfizer CEO Ian Read said Trump likely “hasn’t been briefed” on competition in the drug space. Pharma is “a very complicated industry,” one with a “huge amount of bidding and extremely aggressive purchasing,” Read said at the time.

Earlier this month, after Republicans unveiled a healthcare bill that was free of any measures to address drug prices, Trump tweeted that a “new system” is in the works. Reacting to those statements, Evercore ISI analyst Umer Raffat wondered what Trump meant by bolstering competition.

Raffat wrote that brand vs. generic competition exists and direct brand vs. brand competition—particularly with competitive bidding—requires interchangeable meds, which isn’t always possible. On Friday, Trump selected Scott Gottlieb to lead the FDA, who could move to boost competition by enacting changes at the agency to speed new products to market.

It remains to be seen what kind of proposals might emerge, but Trump himself favors Medicare price negotiations, according to a spokesperson. Pharma critic Rep. Elijah Cummings met with the president earlier this month to discuss his proposal on the subject, and reported afterward that Trump was “enthusiastic” about the idea.

By Eric Sagonowsky

Source: Fierce Pharma

comments closed

Related News

May 21, 2022

As monkeypox cases emerge in US and Europe, Bavarian Nordic inks vaccine order

Life sciences

A monkeypox outbreak is emerging in the U.S. and Europe, and at least one country is amping up countermeasure preparedness. Bavarian Nordic has secured a contract with an unnamed European country to supply its smallpox vaccine, called Imvanex in Europe, in response to the emergence of monkeypox cases, the Danish company said Thursday.

May 21, 2022

Moderna chairman Afeyan defends hiring practices after CFO debacle: report

Life sciences

Moderna’s recent chief financial officer debacle—in which Jorge Gomez departed on his second day on the job—raised questions about the company’s hiring process given its rush to global biopharma prominence. The most obvious one: How was it possible for Gomez to be hired when he was under investigation by his previous employer, Dentsply Sirona of Charlotte, N.C.

May 21, 2022

Merck to pay up to $1.4B in cancer deal with Kelun, but details are scarce

Life sciences

Merck & Co. is plucking a cancer project from the branch of Chinese-based Kelun Pharmaceutical for up to $1.4 billion, but details from the New Jersey-based Big Pharma have been hard to come by. The deal, first disclosed Monday on the Shenzhen stock exchange, has Merck handing over $47 million in upfront cash in exchange for ex-China rights to a “macromolecular tumor project.”