Sector News

Shire's not giving up on target Baxalta, it says amid Q3 beat

October 23, 2015
Life sciences

Shire’s been quiet on the Baxalta front for a while now, but that doesn’t mean its quest to buy the newly formed Illinois drugmaker is over.

On the contrary, the Irish pharma “continues to believe the proposed Baxalta acquisition represents a highly strategic combination” that can help it pump out $20 billion in sales by 2020, it said on Friday.

The way Shire sees it Baxalta, a recent Baxter spinoff and a leader in hemophilia, can help it toward its “ambition to be a rare diseases leader,” CEO Flemming Ornskov said in a statement. But Baxalta hasn’t been so enthusiastic about a tie-up. Over the summer, it dismissed the company’s $30 billion buyout proposal as a “lowball” bid, with CEO Ludwig Hantson pointing out that the two companies’ rare-disease units bear little overlap.

“An acquirer like Shire isn’t just going to find easy savings from a combination with dissimilar assets,” he told investors on an August conference call.

Aside from Baxalta’s reluctance, Shire’s facing another problem with its all-stock bid, too. Its share price has taken a 20% beating since it went public with its offer, making its bid much less appealing to Baxalta shareholders. In September, reports said Shire was looking around for ways to sweeten its proposal without compromising the spinoff’s tax-free status–a key point for Baxalta investors. But with few spinoffs this new involved in M&A deals, there’s not exactly a clear-cut path.

Meanwhile, though, Shire is making strides in the revenue department without its latest M&A target. In the third quarter, sales rose 4% to $1.66 billion, helping grow non-GAAP diluted EPS by 11% to a $3.24 mark that topped analyst estimates. Shire credited some of the top-line rise to ADHD treatment Vyvanse; The med, which Ornskov said continued to perform strongly in the adult market, earlier this year won an FDA nod for binge eating disorder, an indication Shire has said could tack on between $200 million and $300 million to its sales potential.

Some of Shire’s rare-disease standouts put up strong performances, too; its hereditary angioedema portfolio, which it bolstered with 2013’s agreement to pick up ViroPharma, stood out, and products Natpara and Gattex–from recent buy NPS Pharma–are coming along, too, the Dublin drugmaker said.

But the company can forget about seeing any contributions from dry-eye prospect lifitegrast in the near future. Earlier this month, the FDA handed down a rejection for the drug; now, Shire’s planning to resubmit its application in the first quarter of next year if forthcoming data from a recently completed Phase III study turn up positive. The agency’s move puts a prospective approval about 9 months behind the original schedule, to next year’s third quarter, Leerink Partners analyst Jason Gerberry estimated in a recent note to clients.

By Carly Helfand

Source: Fierce Pharma

comments closed

Related News

November 28, 2021

Founder-led biotech is making space for ideas—and diverse leaders—where it didn’t exist before

Life sciences

Decades ago, the founder-led biotech was rare and considered the tougher path to follow. Now there is a trend of founder-led biotechs that have risen in prominence in recent years, going from startup to well known with lightning speed. Scientists-turned C-suite occupants know their technology inside out. They’ve got credibility both at the bench working with their research teams and in the boardrooms selling their future products.

November 28, 2021

Pfizer to become $100B behemoth next year thanks to COVID-19 drug and vaccine: analyst

Life sciences

Pfizer’s revenue could reach $101.3 billion in 2022, with major contributions coming from the company’s BioNTech-partnered COVID vaccine and an antiviral therapeutic that has shown stellar clinical data, SVB Leerink analyst Geoffrey Porges projected in a Monday note to clients.

November 28, 2021

GlaxoSmithKline takes aim at sick pay access inequities with microgrant program and new campaign

Life sciences

In a survey commissioned by GlaxoSmithKline’s consumer health division of 2,000 working people in the U.S., almost 70% admitted to clocking in while sick, often because they couldn’t afford to lose a day’s pay. Black and Latina women were 10% more likely than white women to shun taking sick time for fear of fallout from their boss, according to the company’s 2021 Temperature Check Report.

Send this to a friend