Sector News

Playing catch-up on Big Biotech goal, Shire broadens M&A focus

July 16, 2015
Life sciences
Shire’s $54 billion tie-up with AbbVie–and the subsequent cancellation of that deal–shook up employees and stalled CEO Flemming Ornskov’s plans to transform the company into a biotech the likes of giants Gilead, Biogen and Celgene. It also took the Dublin drugmaker off course in one of its other endeavors: Dealmaking.
 
As Ornskov told The Wall Street Journal, his company is now playing catch-up to secure the deals that will help it on its way to Big Biotech status.
 
“We did lose 6 months,” he said.
 
Last summer, AbbVie–looking to lessen its reliance on best-seller and biosimilar target Humira–agreed to snatch up Shire at a price the Irish pharma couldn’t refuse. But it wasn’t long before new, stricter rules on U.S. tax inversions scared the Illinois drugmaker off, bringing the deal crashing down.
 
For Shire, though, the setback was real. It lost out on one of its targets while the AbbVie takeover plans were occupying its time, and rivals upped the prices on the kinds of biotechs Ornskov had his eye on, the WSJ reports.
 
The result? Shire is now casting a wider net for pickup targets, the Journal notes. Yes, it’s still focused on rare diseases, building up the business it strengthened with 2013’s agreement to buy ViroPharma. But it’s also looking at companies working on maladies that share things in common with rare diseases–a limited number of patients treated at specialized centers, for example.
 
For now, Ornskov says he’s interested in adding meds and companies that work on diseases of the brain, stomach, eyes, hormones and metabolism. Any buys would follow this year’s deal for NPS Pharma, a GI specialist that Ornskov started pressing employees to snag within days of the AbbVie deal collapse, Shire business development head Mark Enyedy told the paper.
 
And they’re likely to happen quickly. “From the AbbVie situation, I understand that one opportunity cost is time,” Ornskov said. “The longer something takes, the longer you wait, the greater the likelihood that you may not get it done.”
 
By Carly Helfand
 

comments closed

Related News

November 28, 2021

Founder-led biotech is making space for ideas—and diverse leaders—where it didn’t exist before

Life sciences

Decades ago, the founder-led biotech was rare and considered the tougher path to follow. Now there is a trend of founder-led biotechs that have risen in prominence in recent years, going from startup to well known with lightning speed. Scientists-turned C-suite occupants know their technology inside out. They’ve got credibility both at the bench working with their research teams and in the boardrooms selling their future products.

November 28, 2021

Pfizer to become $100B behemoth next year thanks to COVID-19 drug and vaccine: analyst

Life sciences

Pfizer’s revenue could reach $101.3 billion in 2022, with major contributions coming from the company’s BioNTech-partnered COVID vaccine and an antiviral therapeutic that has shown stellar clinical data, SVB Leerink analyst Geoffrey Porges projected in a Monday note to clients.

November 28, 2021

GlaxoSmithKline takes aim at sick pay access inequities with microgrant program and new campaign

Life sciences

In a survey commissioned by GlaxoSmithKline’s consumer health division of 2,000 working people in the U.S., almost 70% admitted to clocking in while sick, often because they couldn’t afford to lose a day’s pay. Black and Latina women were 10% more likely than white women to shun taking sick time for fear of fallout from their boss, according to the company’s 2021 Temperature Check Report.

Send this to a friend