Sector News

One more time: We're not buying Valeant, Allergan CEO insists

February 24, 2017
Life sciences

Allergan CEO Brent Saunders has said it before, and he’ll say it again: He’s not interested in buying Valeant. He might “take five minutes” to think about a Bristol-Myers acquisition, though.

When scouting targets, Allergan likes “things with pipeline and innovation,” he told Bloomberg Wednesday. And those are assets that Saunders is “not aware” Valeant has.

Valeant, of course, made its name on rampant M&A under former skipper J. Michael Pearson—not R&D.

It’s not the first time Saunders has shot down the possibility of picking up the embattled drugmaker. “We look to buy young products that we think we can put into our hands and do better with and really grow, or we buy R&D assets. And best I can tell, Valeant just doesn’t fit that bill,” he told CNBC last September.

Why do questions about a Valeant-Allergan tie up persist? For one, the two drugmakers have quite a bit of overlap when it comes to their businesses; Valeant plays in eye care, skin care, gastrointestinal remedies and women’s health, all of which fall under Allergan’s list of core therapeutic areas.

Then there’s Saunders’ history of pulling the trigger on large deals. As Bausch & Lomb CEO, he negotiated the sale of that company to Valeant, and soon after, at the helm of Forest Labs, he engineered its merger with Actavis. Then, as Actavis chief, he bought Allergan in a “transformational” deal that took Actavis from generic drugmaker to “growth pharma.” Finally, he sold Allergan’s generics unit to Teva Pharmaceutical in a $40.5 billion transaction and helped orchestrate a record-breaking $160 billion Pfizer merger that the U.S. Treasury later quashed.

And of course, there’s the dramatic irony of a potential Allergan-buys-Valeant scenario, considering the months-long hostile pursuit Valeant mounted for Allergan back in 2014.

Saunders, though, also told the news service that he doesn’t “want to buy a turnaround situation,” which would categorically exclude Allergan’s one-time suitor. Losing the Allergan quest was the beginning of a huge decline for Valeant, which has since run up against political pricing pushback, fraud charges, debt-default worries, and enough other issues to have it looking to sell of pieces of its business for cash.

One potential target he wouldn’t ignore out of hand, though? Bristol-Myers Squibb, whose recent immuno-oncology setbacks have spurred plenty of takeover chatter.

“I think everybody is looking at Bristol,” he said. It would be a “very, very high hurdle” for a company like Allergan pull off a BMS buy, but for any chief exec, “you’re going to at least take five minutes to think about it.”

By Carly Helfand

Source: Fierce Pharma

comments closed

Related News

May 21, 2022

As monkeypox cases emerge in US and Europe, Bavarian Nordic inks vaccine order

Life sciences

A monkeypox outbreak is emerging in the U.S. and Europe, and at least one country is amping up countermeasure preparedness. Bavarian Nordic has secured a contract with an unnamed European country to supply its smallpox vaccine, called Imvanex in Europe, in response to the emergence of monkeypox cases, the Danish company said Thursday.

May 21, 2022

Moderna chairman Afeyan defends hiring practices after CFO debacle: report

Life sciences

Moderna’s recent chief financial officer debacle—in which Jorge Gomez departed on his second day on the job—raised questions about the company’s hiring process given its rush to global biopharma prominence. The most obvious one: How was it possible for Gomez to be hired when he was under investigation by his previous employer, Dentsply Sirona of Charlotte, N.C.

May 21, 2022

Merck to pay up to $1.4B in cancer deal with Kelun, but details are scarce

Life sciences

Merck & Co. is plucking a cancer project from the branch of Chinese-based Kelun Pharmaceutical for up to $1.4 billion, but details from the New Jersey-based Big Pharma have been hard to come by. The deal, first disclosed Monday on the Shenzhen stock exchange, has Merck handing over $47 million in upfront cash in exchange for ex-China rights to a “macromolecular tumor project.”