Sector News

GSK refuses to be bounced into early consumer unit spin-off

February 4, 2016
Life sciences

(Reuters) – GlaxoSmithKline said on Wednesday it would not be pushed into an early spin-off or sale of its consumer health business, despite speculation the unit could be a target for the likes of Reckitt Benckiser or Procter & Gamble.

Britain’s biggest drugmaker has forged a leading non-prescription consumer health business, with 2015 sales of 6 billion pounds ($8.7 billion), following a complex asset swap with Novartis (NOVN.VX) that concluded last year.

Chief Executive Andrew Witty reiterated in a results call with reporters that the creation of the consumer joint venture (JV) with Novartis, in which GSK has a controlling 63.5 percent stake, gave “optionality” for the future.

But he stressed GSK was only one year into a three-year process of integrating Novartis’ products and doubling the profit margins at the business.

“It would be extremely unwise to do anything in anticipation of that,” he said. “The chances of us doing something in an accelerated time frame are, I think, extraordinarily low.”

Even once the consumer operation is bedded down and running at a “steady state”, it was not obvious that GSK would be better off spinning it off, he added.

“If you were asking that question today, based on everything I can see from an external environment, my recommendation would probably be not to change the status quo. But obviously at a different date in the future you may come to a different conclusion to that question,” Witty said.

A spokeswoman for Reckitt declined to comment on its potential interest in GSK’s operations but said the company was interested in growing its consumer health business and looked at all opportunities where Reckitt could be a better owner.

Officials at Procter & Gamble declined to comment.

The consumer unit sells many successful brands, including Sensodyne toothpaste and a range of over-the-counter remedies, such as the painkillers Voltaren and Panadol. Novartis has an option to sell its stake in the JV to GSK after three years.

GSK argues that building up its presence in such long-lasting consumer brands gives the drugmaker a more stable and sustainable earnings profile.

But in an era where many companies are breaking up to achieve greater focus, not all its shareholders agree with the strategy.

The issue has been kept live by a high-profile call by Neil Woodford, founder of Woodford Investment Management, for GSK to be split up.

By Ben Hirschler (Additional reporting by Martinne Geller; Editing by Elaine Hardcastle)

comments closed

Related News

May 21, 2022

As monkeypox cases emerge in US and Europe, Bavarian Nordic inks vaccine order

Life sciences

A monkeypox outbreak is emerging in the U.S. and Europe, and at least one country is amping up countermeasure preparedness. Bavarian Nordic has secured a contract with an unnamed European country to supply its smallpox vaccine, called Imvanex in Europe, in response to the emergence of monkeypox cases, the Danish company said Thursday.

May 21, 2022

Moderna chairman Afeyan defends hiring practices after CFO debacle: report

Life sciences

Moderna’s recent chief financial officer debacle—in which Jorge Gomez departed on his second day on the job—raised questions about the company’s hiring process given its rush to global biopharma prominence. The most obvious one: How was it possible for Gomez to be hired when he was under investigation by his previous employer, Dentsply Sirona of Charlotte, N.C.

May 21, 2022

Merck to pay up to $1.4B in cancer deal with Kelun, but details are scarce

Life sciences

Merck & Co. is plucking a cancer project from the branch of Chinese-based Kelun Pharmaceutical for up to $1.4 billion, but details from the New Jersey-based Big Pharma have been hard to come by. The deal, first disclosed Monday on the Shenzhen stock exchange, has Merck handing over $47 million in upfront cash in exchange for ex-China rights to a “macromolecular tumor project.”