Sector News

Don’t fall for Shire’s ‘lowball’ bid, Baxalta CEO urges. Be true to our solo prospects instead

August 12, 2015
Life sciences
Last week, Baxalta rejected a $30 billion buyout bid from Shire, pointing to its youth, its standalone prospects and a portfolio that just wouldn’t jibe with the Irish pharma’s. On Monday, its CEO hammered those points home once again for investors–and stressed that Shire’s proposal, as it stands, is “wholly inadequate.”
 
Baxalta’s leaders made the “correct decision” not to engage with the Dublin drugmaker, skipper Ludwig Hantson insisted, noting that the $45.23-per-share offer “wasn’t close” to where it should be if Shire wants Baxalta to come to the table.
 
“In some respects, the nature of Shire’s interest in Baxalta is puzzling. Is it trying to opportunistically acquire our attractive hemophilia, immunology and growing oncology platforms without true synergies? We have an attractive set of franchises and it would be a shame to hand it over for a lowball valuation,” Hantson said on a call with shareholders.
 
Sure, Shire could bring along tax advantages for the Illinois drugmaker, thanks to its Irish address. But that’s where the savings would end, Baxalta believes. Though the two companies both focus on rare diseases, there’s little overlap, with Baxalta’s focus mainly on plasma. Combining plasma with other biopharma businesses won’t make easy cost cuts, Hantson contends.
 
“An acquirer like Shire isn’t just going to find easy savings from a combination with dissimilar assets,” he said.
 
When it comes to Baxalta’s standalone prospects, though, Hantson’s outlook is much rosier. The company is aiming to launch 20 new products by 2020, which should help it generate more than $2.5 billion in risk-adjusted sales. Its infrastructure and manufacturing “will provide an excellent platform to grow value,” too, he said.
 
Some analysts, though, have applauded Shire’s decision to go after Baxalta–and quickly. Cowen & Co. analyst Ken Cacciatore, for one, views the proposal–initially brought to Baxalta just 9 days after it spun off from parent company Baxter–as “value-creating and appropriately aggressive,” he wrote in a Monday note to clients.
 
By Carly Helfand
 

comments closed

Related News

October 1, 2023

Clinical data from Boston Scientific and rivals could reshape pulmonary embolism market: analysts

Life sciences

After attending the annual Pulmonary Embolism Symposium last week in Austin, Texas, the analysts predicted clinical guidelines could shift toward catheter-based therapy once data from ongoing randomized trials is available.

October 1, 2023

AstraZeneca and SAS link up on AI and analytics

Life sciences

SAS – the AI and analytics company – has been selected by AstraZeneca to help boost efficiency and drive automation in the delivery of statistical analyses for clinical and post-approval submissions to regulatory authorities.

October 1, 2023

Will Big Pharma engage in Medicare price negotiations? Merck, AZ and BMS say they will

Life sciences

After the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) revealed the list of drugs set to face the first round of price negotiations under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), the drugmakers responsible for marketing them are confronting a series of deadlines.

How can we help you?

We're easy to reach