Sector News

Does Bristol-Myers have a plan B if activists scuttle its Celgene buy?

March 11, 2019
Life sciences

What’s Bristol-Myers Squibb’s Plan B if its Celgene deal falls through? BMS won’t say whether it has one at all. And the company may be more likely to need a backup plan than some industry-watchers think.

As Wolfe Research’s Tim Anderson pointed out in a note to clients, the company has so far skirted questions about how it would proceed without the $74 billion takeout, saying only that “their focus is on getting the Celgene deal done.”

“They gave no insights on the path forward under this alternative scenario,” Anderson wrote, noting that if the deal doesn’t happen, Bristol’s past “string-of-pearls” strategy, which focused on small acquisitions, may not be enough to take it into the future.

And the way he sees it, it might be time to think about alternatives. Activist investor Starboard Value has already started working to take down the merger, and top shareholder Wellington Management has come out against it, too.

Anderson and his colleagues are hearing from other investors that “there continues to be uneasiness about the merits of the transaction and what the combined company will be capable of delivering to shareholders.”

Other analysts, though, have said they still expect the deal to close as planned.

“Wellington, even combined with similarly positioned funds, lacks the votes to sway the deal outcome,” Atlantic Equities analysts wrote recently. And Starboard’s stake is even smaller.

Meanwhile, though BMS may not be focusing on different endings to the Celgene story, other biopharma companies might be. Anderson—who has long contended that Bristol’s I-O struggles could make it a takeout target—suspects that its “actions are in fact partly designed to prevent itself from being acquired.”

“Management stopped short of saying whether there has been any informal indication of interest in BMS by another party, which still leaves open a possible motive for the transaction,” he wrote, adding that “whether there was informal interest recently, or whether [the company] is merely anticipating this as a future risk, is not clear.”

Also unclear? Which company could—and would—swallow a drugmaker of Bristol’s size. Many of the best-equipped companies, including Pfizer and AbbVie, have come out against megadeals in recent weeks.

By Carly Helfand

Source: Fierce Pharma

comments closed

Related News

December 3, 2022

Sanofi moves into swanky new Paris HQ designed around hybrid work and sustainability

Life sciences

Monday, the French pharma giant officially moved into its new global home base in Paris, dubbed La Maison Sanofi. The 9,000-square-meter (about 96,875-square-foot) facility comprises two historic buildings and will host around 500 employees, the company explained in a release.

December 3, 2022

As CEO Schultz eyes retirement, Teva taps former Sandoz head Francis as its next leader

Life sciences

On the first day of the new year, former Sandoz chief Richard Francis will take the reins from Schultz, who is hanging up his CEO hat to retire on Dec. 31, Teva said Monday. The news comes a little more than two weeks after Teva publicly said it was looking for Schultz’s replacement.

December 3, 2022

General Electric sets healthcare division spinoff plans

Life sciences

General Electric Co. set the terms for the spinoff of its healthcare division, putting an initial value of roughly $31 billion on the soon-to-be-public company. The Boston conglomerate plans to split into three separate public companies by early 2024. Following the healthcare spinoff, it plans to separate its aerospace business from its power and renewable-energy units.