Sector News

Deal buzz: Forget Pfizer. Traders bet GSK as a match for J&J, Roche

June 17, 2015
Life sciences
Another week, another rumor about the target on GlaxoSmithKline’s back. This time, U.K. traders were talking up a different potential takeover–not by Pfizer, but by Johnson & Johnson or Roche.
 
As the Daily Mail reports, dealers were speculating about a 1900 pence-per-share bid from either Big Pharma company, which would value GSK at more than £92 billion ($143 billion). The company’s shares closed at 1351 pence Monday.
 
And therein lies the root of the deal talk: GSK shares are way, way down. In mid-April the stock was trading at 1642 pence. While today’s prices aren’t as low as GSK’s nadir in January–1327 pence–it’s a far cry from the 1700-plus of two years ago.
 
“People are hovering because of the vulnerability of the group at this price,” one of the Mail’s market sources said late Monday.
 
They’re also hovering because pharma M&A is still going gangbusters, even after a spate of large deals that included Actavis’ buyout of branded drugmaker Allergan and Glaxo’s own asset swap with Novartis.
 
The logic for a J&J or Roche bid? Perhaps not as strong as the case for a Pfizer buyout. True, J&J could add Glaxo’s joint venture with Novartis on consumer health to its own sizable OTC-drug and consumer-products business. But J&J isn’t into vaccines, and its prescription drug business lacks a respiratory segment, which is GSK’s major pharma concern these days. Maybe J&J would like to be in those fields? Hmm. Maybe.
 
As for Roche, the Swiss drugmaker has never shown much inclination for diversifying into consumer health–or into anything much besides diagnostics, for that matter. While its crosstown rival Novartis moved into eye care, over-the-counter drugs, vaccines and more, Roche stuck to its prescription drug focus; even its diagnostics unit feeds into drug development, what with biomarker R&D and companion diagnostic tests for its targeted treatments. Roche’s big buy over the last few years was Genentech–about as focused as Roche could get, given that it owned a big chunk of the company already. Since then, it has inked one biotech deal after another, including its $8.3 billion deal for InterMune last year.
 
Pfizer, on the other hand, has vaccines. It has consumer health operations that it says it would like to build up. At least one analyst–Gregg Gilbert at Deutsche Bank–has run the numbers on a Pfizer-GSK combo and come up with some earnings benefits. And that was at an assumed price of 1924 pence per share–higher than the current speculative price.
 
But there are plenty of reasons to discount the idea of a Pfizer buyout, too, not least that the U.S. company got burned big-time last year when it tried to go after GSK’s fellow British-based drugmaker AstraZeneca. Plus, as analysts have pointed out, a smaller buy such as Shire or Perrigo might be a better fit
 
For GSK shareholders, a megamerger may just be wishful thinking. CEO Andrew Witty’s plans for slow, if steady, advancement in low-margin businesses aren’t exactly a prescription for short-term stock growth.
 
By Tracy Staton
 

comments closed

Related News

January 29, 2023

Colorcon, Inc. signs Put agreement with intent to acquire controlled atmosphere packaging specialist Airnov Healthcare Packaging

Life sciences

Airnov provides critical healthcare industries with high-quality, controlled atmosphere packaging, to protect their products from moisture and oxygen. The business has manufacturing facilities in the USA, France, China and India and employs around 700 people.

January 29, 2023

Takeda pledges up to $1.13B for rights to Hutchmed’s cancer drug fruquintinib outside of China

Life sciences

Takeda of Japan has partnered with Hong Kong-based Hutchmed, gaining the commercial rights to colorectal cancer drug fruquintinib outside of China for $400 million up front, plus $730 million in potential milestone payments. Takeda also will help develop fruquintinib, which can be applied to subtypes of refractory metastatic colorectal cancer, regardless of biomarker status, the companies said.

January 29, 2023

Vir taps Bayer dealmaker Marianne De Backer as its next CEO

Life sciences

On April 3, Scangos, who’s been chief executive officer at Vir since the start of 2017, will hand over the reins to Marianne De Backer, Ph.D. De Backer comes over from Bayer, where she currently heads up pharmaceutical strategy, business development and licensing. Alongside her CEO appointment, De Backer is set to join Vir’s board of directors, the company said Wednesday.

How can we help you?

We're easy to reach