Sector News

Women CEOs more vulnerable to attacks by activist investors: HBR

February 13, 2018
Diversity & Inclusion

It doesn’t get any easier for women once they take the CEO seat.

They are more frequently targeted than men CEOs by activist investors, according to an article in the Harvard Business Review by three university professors who focus on finance and corporate governance.

The professors—Vishal K. Gupta, Sandra Mortal and Daniel B. Turban—discerned that female CEOs face a greater threat of shareholder activism than male CEOs.

They found that companies led by male CEOs were targeted by an activist 6% of the time during their study period, versus 9.4% when the CEO was female. Wolf pack attacks—when more than one activist is involved—were carried out against male and female CEOs 1% and 1.6% of the time, respectively.

Even though the differences appear small, this means that firms with female CEOs were 50% more likely to be targeted by activists and approximately 60% more likely to be targeted by multiple activists.

“People tend to take action with bias even if they don’t realize it,” Joe Solmonese, former president of the Human Rights Campaign, told FierceCEO. “There is a stereotype with women CEOs that they are more empathetic, softer, and it could be thought they would be more willing to give in to the activists.”

The findings “don’t startle me at all,” he said. “To me it says there is a perception women are more easily bullied.”

The fact that female CEOs are targeted more than male CEOs could be troubling, since it may perpetuate negative gender stereotypes of female executives. People perceive activism to be an indicator of how well a company and its CEO are performing, so greater activism against female CEOs may reinforce the notion that they are not able to manage companies as well as men.

“This speaks to gender bias in a big way,” said Julie Kampf, CEO of executive search firm JBK Associates International. “There is a bias that men activists feel women don’t know as much as men in this arena. It’s not sinister or planned. It’s unconscious.”

There may be the perception that female CEOs are targeted more often because investors have a “think manager, think male” mentality. Many attributes associated with the CEO role (decisiveness, aggression, competitiveness) are often antithetical to those associated with women. These kinds of gender stereotypes may lead to the perception that women are not fit to be managers, resulting in more activism being directed at firms led by female CEOs.

By Karen Talley

Source: FierceCEO

comments closed

Related News

March 19, 2023

The gender pay gap hasn’t changed in 20 years — here’s what it’ll take, according to Chief members

Diversity & Inclusion

It’s been nearly 60 years since the Equal Pay Act, and while women have made major strides both in the workforce and in higher education, the gains are far from equitable. In honor of Equal Pay Day, four Chief Members share the barriers women face when it comes to earning fair pay, and the policies and practices leaders should implement now to really move the needle forward.

March 11, 2023

More roles for women on boards is great, but what about the c-suite?

Diversity & Inclusion

The good news is that some progress at the board level has been achieved, particularly in the UK and the EU. However, much more work must be done to attain gender-equal boards and c-suites with people from more diverse backgrounds.

March 3, 2023

The not-so-secret world of low-cost New York City private schools

Diversity & Inclusion

When we hear the term “New York City private school,” most of us likely think of the elite, urban prep schools with tuition price-tags of well over $50,000 a year. Those certainly exist, but they are outnumbered by an abundance of low-cost private schools throughout the city.

How can we help you?

We're easy to reach