In a recent discussion with the chief diversity officer at a Fortunate 500 company, my conversation partner pointed out that the workplace has become increasingly politicized.
He noted that the distinctions employers and employees used to make between work life and personal life have become less well-defined.
And, of course, he’s right. Whether the blurring of that work/personal line is right or wrong is a reasonable question. But regardless of the answer, the reality is that the current moment makes such a separation impossible. The question on the table now is, given this fact, how can employers navigate this space knowing that politics are, by their very nature, contentious and controversial?
Making matters more complicated, we are experiencing the politicization of the workplace at the same time we’re reaching new heights of self-censorship. The latest poll from the Cato institute, suggests that “Nearly two-thirds—62%—of Americans say the political climate these days prevents them from saying things they believe because others might find them offensive.”
An environment in which people feel they have to step carefully around political issues while, at the same time, those same political issues permeate every aspect of our lives, can only result in tension.
This means that, whether employers like it or not, the challenge of how to keep the peace has landed at their doorstep. Organizations have choices in how they respond to the current sociopolitical moment. One option is to go the way of Ben & Jerry’s who, in relation to the racial justice movement, decided to fully and publicly embrace political engagement. This approach has the advantage of sending an unambiguous message to employees and patrons. We all know where the company stands.
Other employers don’t wish to go that route. This may be for any number of reasons, including the desire to welcome a clientele and a workforce with a wide range of views on politics and/or on the extent to which they want their employer to take a political stance. While it seems daunting, employers and organizations who wish to go this latter route can take certain steps to maintain a healthy climate.
Below are four points, some of which I touched on here, that employers can build into the workplace culture to ensure the climate is robust while respecting different perspectives. In situations where interactions are going to repeated, if political diversity is valued, attention must be paid to both the maintenance of strong relationships and to the goal of open communication. Honesty, clarity, humility, and compromise are the guiding principles here.
Again, organizations and institutions of any size, if they haven’t already, are going to be faced with these issues. Hopefully, these four recommendations can help serve as a starting point for internal conversations going forward.
By: Ilana Redstone
In the wake of George Floyd’s murder, corporate interest in DEI is higher than ever. But has this increased attention racial justice and inequity led to real, meaningful change? The authors conducted interviews with more than 40 CDOs before and after summer 2020 and identified four major shifts in how these leaders perceived their companies’ engagement with DEI.
Mid-career women are often surprised by the levels of bias and discrimination they encounter in the workplace, especially if they’ve successfully avoided it earlier in their careers. After speaking to 100 senior women executives, the authors identified three distinct kinds of bias and discrimination faced by mid-career women. They describe each bias and conclude with recommendations for overcoming them.
Bain research shows that men and women have consistent motivations when it comes to work, across factors like financial orientation and camaraderie. They also have similar attitudes on inclusion, with fewer than 30% feeling included in the workplace. Despite a lack of intrinsic differences, women and men continue to have different outcomes and experiences at work, due to meaningful imbalances in occupation choice, prioritization of flexibility, and the perpetuation of biases.