Sector News

CEO Sponsorship Unlocks Boardroom Doors: A Key to Gender Parity

August 19, 2015
Diversity & Inclusion
Like any club, it takes a sponsor to “get in.” Country clubs, professional associations and even a job requires legitimate references who know you. So too, for boardrooms. As board directors can impact a company’s earnings, stock price, and decide who will be the CEO, getting into the boardroom requires qualifications, experience and yes, sponsorship; being endorsed by someone at the boardroom table is critical!
 
In 2013, Pricewaterhousecooper’s annual Corporate Directors Survey of nearly 1,000 board directors stated that 90% of new board directors came from “the board’s network.” With this startling statistic, how can change be accelerated when board directors go to their networks for candidates? How can talented board ready women get into that network and on a board?
 
Without legislation, there is only one solution: CEOs and board chairs. These leaders have seen women in action in their own companies: women who run divisions, functions, government agencies, global organizations, academic institutions, scientific centers, etc. CEOs and board chairs have the power to drive change — they are the change drivers to recommend and sponsor women.
 
When a CEO sponsors a woman as board ready – they are endorsing the woman as having the intellect, strategic thinking, financial business acumen and collaborative problem-solving skills to sit at a board table. The CEO signature goes a long way of getting women into that inner circle.
 
The Women’s Forum of New York has provided a vehicle to accelerate sponsorship of board ready women by CEOs and board chairs. A database was established in 2012 inviting all CEOs/board chairs to nominate women who they know are board qualified and ready. Given how busy these executives are, they need only to fill out a simple sponsorship form HERE and send it to ceosponsorship@womensforumny.org. Information on these women is made available free of charge to Nom/Gov Committees and search firms.
 
Of course, women cannot rely solely on CEO sponsorship to happen organically. Women with the “readiness and qualifications” to be on a board must still leverage and expand their own networks to make their interest in becoming a board member known to CEOs and their network of contacts.
 
The pool of board ready women is extensive and global yet it becomes truly visible and viable when women are sponsored by CEOs/board chairs. Let’s bring more board ready women into the network — the pipeline of talent is bursting to be tapped. Sponsor women and join the U.S. effort to get all boards to parity by 2025!
 

comments closed

Related News

September 25, 2022

What has (and hasn’t) changed about being a Chief Diversity Officer

Diversity & Inclusion

In the wake of George Floyd’s murder, corporate interest in DEI is higher than ever. But has this increased attention racial justice and inequity led to real, meaningful change? The authors conducted interviews with more than 40 CDOs before and after summer 2020 and identified four major shifts in how these leaders perceived their companies’ engagement with DEI.

September 17, 2022

3 workplace biases that derail mid-career women

Diversity & Inclusion

Mid-career women are often surprised by the levels of bias and discrimination they encounter in the workplace, especially if they’ve successfully avoided it earlier in their careers. After speaking to 100 senior women executives, the authors identified three distinct kinds of bias and discrimination faced by mid-career women. They describe each bias and conclude with recommendations for overcoming them.

September 11, 2022

Working women and the war for talent

Diversity & Inclusion

Bain research shows that men and women have consistent motivations when it comes to work, across factors like financial orientation and camaraderie. They also have similar attitudes on inclusion, with fewer than 30% feeling included in the workplace. Despite a lack of intrinsic differences, women and men continue to have different outcomes and experiences at work, due to meaningful imbalances in occupation choice, prioritization of flexibility, and the perpetuation of biases.