Sector News

Westlake goes hostile after Axiall rejects second, $3.1-billion bid

April 5, 2016
Energy & Chemical Value Chain

Axiall’s board of directors has turned down a second, $3.1-billion acquisition bid from Westlake Chemical. Westlake has responded by formally ending negotiations and asking Axiall shareholders to elect a new board selected by Westlake.

The new bid, submitted on 29 March, offered $23.35 ($14.00 in cash and 0.1967 of a Westlake share) for each share of Axiall, 17% above the $2.9-billion bid submitted 29 January.

“Given the Axiall board’s unrealistic expectations and entrenched position, we feel we have no choice but to proceed today with a proxy contest to replace Axiall’s directors with new, independent, and highly qualified directors who are willing to evaluate all options in accordance with their fiduciary duties,” says Westlake president and CEO Albert Chao in a letter sent to Axiall shareholders on 4 April. Westlake named its slate 16 February.

In his letter, Chao notes that Axiall shares were trading at $9.60 the day before Westlake’s initial offer. “[S]ince then, nothing has changed in Axiall’s outlook that would lead to a standalone valuation anywhere near the value of our proposal,” he says. “In addition, Axiall has consistently overestimated the earnings power of its business and has a track record of failing to deliver on its operational and strategic objectives.”

Axiall shares opened at $22.68 on 4 April, quickly rose to $23.14, and fell back to $22.66 by late morning.

Axiall says it had been “actively engaged in discussions with Westlake” since 8 March to see if the company “was willing to make a revised proposal that appropriately reflects the high quality of Axiall’s assets, the significant growth potential of its business, and the powerful synergies available in a combination.” In a letter rejecting Westlake’s second bid, Axiall CEO Timothy Mann says the board was “surprised and disappointed” that Westlake had revised its bid before “the completion” of the discussions.

“In particular, we struggle to understand why you would not engage in any meaningful discussion of the very substantial synergies between the two companies prior to your revised proposal especially since we have told you we believe the synergies could be as high as $270 million annually,” the letter says. “This is $210 million more than the $60 million in synergies underlying your proposal. In addition, as there is a substantial stock component to your proposal, we would need the opportunity to conduct due diligence with respect to Westlake’s business if we were to move forward,” Mann says.

By Clay Boswell

Source: Chemical Week

comments closed

Related News

April 14, 2024

Nadja Håkansson appointed Chief Executive Officer of thyssenkrupp Uhde

Energy & Chemical Value Chain

The future CEO of thyssenkrupp Uhde, Nadja Håkansson, has held various management positions at Siemens and Siemens Energy and looks back on over 18 years of national and international experience in the areas of supply chain management, operations, sales and corporate management.

April 14, 2024

Neste and Lotte Chemical team up to scale renewable plastics from used cooking oil

Energy & Chemical Value Chain

Neste and South Korean company Lotte Chemical have partnered on a project to elevate the sustainability profile of chemicals and plastics. The partnership’s ambition is to replace fossil resources with renewable raw materials that offer a lower carbon footprint.

April 14, 2024

EU chemical industry confidence shows upward trend

Energy & Chemical Value Chain

At least the confidence in the chemical sector has been seeing an upward trend and the trade balance is recovering as destocking seems to be coming to an end. Citing projections from the European Central Bank, CEFIC states that the level of inflation is expected to fall from 5.4% in 2023 to 2.3% in 2024.

How can we help you?

We're easy to reach