Sector News

Westlake agrees to buy Axiall for $3.8 billion

June 13, 2016
Chemical Value Chain

Westlake Chemical has agreed to acquire Axiall for $33.00 share–65% more than Westlake originally offered–in an all-cash transaction that values Axiall at about $3.8 billion.

The companies say the transaction has been unanimously approved by the boards of directors of both companies, and it is expected to close by the fourth quarter.

The deal vindicates Axiall’s management, which had been holding out for a higher price for six months. Westlake made its first bid in January, offering $20.00 share, $11/share in cash and the remainder in Westlake stock, for a total of about $2.9 billion; and a second in April, offering $23.50/share, with $14/share in cash, for a total of about $3.1 billion. Axiall rejected both offers as “opportunistic and inadequate.”

Westlake turned up the pressure in May, nominating a proxy slate to replace Axiall’s board of directors at its annual meeting this month. Axiall responded by inviting Westlake to revise its bid by 3 June, and Westlake accepted. No sooner had that deadline passed, however, than Lotte Chemical (Seoul) made a surprise entrance, announcing on 7 June that it had submitted a bid of its own.

Today’s announcement settles the matter. The deal will create the third-largest chlor-alkali producer and the second-largest PVC producer in North America, with expected combined pro forma revenues of $7.6 billion and Ebitda of $1.5 billion for the 12 months ended in the first quarter of 2016. Westlake says it expects the transaction to be accretive to earnings in the first year after close, and to deliver annualized cost synergies of about $100 million.

Analyst Hassan Ahmed of Alembic Global Advisors (New York) praised the deal. “We see this deal being positive for Westlake shares,” he said in a note issued this morning. “We estimate operational synergies of around $340 million–far higher than management’s announced $100 million. The $340 million synergy figure would imply that the Axiall acquisition would be 29% accretive off the bat.”

“This transaction aligns two remarkable companies, creates a company with greater financial and operational flexibility and accelerates our growth strategy,” says Albert Chao, Westlake’s president and CEO. “We believe that after this transaction we will be better able to serve our customers with a more diversified portfolio that should create significant value and growth opportunities for Westlake stockholders.”

Lotte will remain in the picture. Westlake noted in the deal’s announcement that it “looks forward to working with Lotte Chemical on its current joint venture with Axiall,” an ethane cracker under construction in Lake Charles, LA.

By Clay Boswell

Source: Chemical Week

comments closed

Related News

September 25, 2022

France and Sweden both launch ‘first of a kind’ hydrogen facilities

Chemical Value Chain

France has launched an offshore green hydrogen production platform at the country’s Port of Saint-Nazaire this week, along with its first offshore wind farm. The hydrogen plant, which its operators say is the world’s first facility of its type, coincides with the launch of another “first of its kind” facility in Sweden dedicated to storing hydrogen in an underground lined rock cavern (LRC).

September 25, 2022

NextChem announces €194-million grant for waste-to-hydrogen project in Rome

Chemical Value Chain

The project sets up the Hydrogen Valley in Rome, the first industrial-scale technological hub for the development of the national supply chain for the production, transport, storage and use of hydrogen for the decarbonization of industrial processes and for sustainable mobility.

September 25, 2022

The problem with hydrogen

Chemical Value Chain

At first glance, hydrogen seems to be the perfect solution to our energy needs. It doesn’t produce any carbon dioxide when used. It can store energy for long periods of time. It doesn’t leave behind hazardous waste materials, like nuclear does. And it doesn’t require large swathes of land to be flooded, like hydroelectricity. Seems too good to be true. So…what’s the catch?