Enzymes maker Novozymes will cut 198 jobs and invest more in emerging markets, it said on Wednesday, adding it could time take to recapture past growth rates amid uncertainty over U.S. renewable energy policy and the takeover of a key partner.
The Danish company’s business flourished after being spun off from drugmaker Novo Nordisk in 2000, but a lower oil price in recent years has hit demand for its enzymes used in detergents, animal feed and in the production of biofuel.
Its shares rose more than 5 percent in early trading after it posted slightly better than expected fourth-quarter earnings and announced a share buyback program worth up to 2 billion Danish crowns ($287 million).
But they had reversed to trade down 4.4 percent at 241.90 crowns by 1250 GMT.
“This is a new reality for Novozymes,” Chief Executive Peder Holk Nielsen told Reuters, referring to the job cuts and adding he “could no longer rely on growth to take us through the difficulties.”
Novozymes, which had 6,441 employees at the end of 2016, said it would increase investment in innovation and expand in South East Asia, Africa and the Middle East, but that would take time to boost revenues.
For 2017, the company expects organic sales growth – stripping out currency moves – of 2-5 percent. Last year, it cut its long-term organic sales growth expectations to 6-7 percent a year for 2017-2020, down from 8-10 percent before.
Nielsen did not set any longer-term targets on Wednesday, but said products launched in 2018-2020 would help return to historic growth rates.
He said Bayer’s takeover of key partner Monsanto could extend the market for Novozymes’ smart microbial crop-boosting products, known as inoculants, but acknowledged “transactional risks” from the deal.
“There’s a risk that the huge focus Monsanto has had on biological solutions will be less at Bayer,” he said. “That’s not our expectation, but we don’t know until the transaction is finalised.”
He also said the U.S. market for biofuels faced uncertainty, as incoming U.S. President Donald Trump could scale back a program designed cut greenhouse gas emissions that requires energy firms to blend ethanol and biodiesel into gasoline an diesel.
“My sense is that even if they remove the entire legislation on bioethanol, consumption in the United States will still be high, although probably a little less that today,” Nielsen said.
By Jacob Gronholt-Pedersen and Teis Jensen
France has launched an offshore green hydrogen production platform at the country’s Port of Saint-Nazaire this week, along with its first offshore wind farm. The hydrogen plant, which its operators say is the world’s first facility of its type, coincides with the launch of another “first of its kind” facility in Sweden dedicated to storing hydrogen in an underground lined rock cavern (LRC).
The project sets up the Hydrogen Valley in Rome, the first industrial-scale technological hub for the development of the national supply chain for the production, transport, storage and use of hydrogen for the decarbonization of industrial processes and for sustainable mobility.
At first glance, hydrogen seems to be the perfect solution to our energy needs. It doesn’t produce any carbon dioxide when used. It can store energy for long periods of time. It doesn’t leave behind hazardous waste materials, like nuclear does. And it doesn’t require large swathes of land to be flooded, like hydroelectricity. Seems too good to be true. So…what’s the catch?