Sector News

Chatterjee Group to acquire 90% stake in Mitsubishi Chemical’s India unit

July 28, 2016
Chemical Value Chain

The Chatterjee Group (TCG) led by New York-based serial investor Purnendu Chatterjee on Wednesday signed an agreement to acquire a 90% stake in Mitsubishi Chemical Corp.’s Indian subsidiary, MCC PTA India Corp. Pvt. Ltd, for an estimated $48 million, or Rs.323 crore at the current exchange rate.

The deal rescues MCC PTA, a producer of purified terephthalic acid, or PTA (a precursor to polyester), from potential closure and secures the jobs of some 1,100 workers, said a person close to Chatterjee, asking not to be identified.

Mitsubishi Chemical said on Wednesday that it was scaling back its investments in commodity chemicals such as PTA to focus on other businesses.

At a board meeting in Tokyo on Wednesday, Mitsubishi Chemical decided to divest itself of its PTA unit in China as well.

Built at a cost of Rs.1,475 crore and commissioned in 1999, the company’s factory in Haldia in East Midnapore district is one of the biggest Japanese investments in India.

In 2009-10, its capacity was expanded with a substantial investment of close to Rs.2,000 crore.

Though it is in some difficulty now, it is inherently a good company, Chatterjee said in a phone interview, adding, “I am delighted to able to collaborate with a technological giant such as Mitsubishi Chemical Corp.”

Because product lines are different, the deal may not have any immediate implication for TCG’s other major investment in West Bengal: Haldia Petrochemicals Ltd (HPL), in which Chatterjee recently acquired a controlling stake from the state government, ending years of bickering over control.

However, going forward, the deal is expected to make technology available to HPL to expand, Chatterjee said.

TCG, according to Mitsubishi Chemical’s statement, has operating assets worth $900 million across the world.

For several years on the trot, MCC PTA has been making losses as revenue declined in the wake of Chinese dumping: in the year till March 2016, its net loss deepened to Rs.2,911 crore on revenue of Rs.4,740 crore. Its net worth has been completely eroded.

Substantial capacity was created in China beginning in 2009-2010, which led to a global glut in the PTA market. That, in turn, impaired MCC PTA’s pricing power. The company started to tumble down a slippery slope as cheap Chinese imports incrementally dented profitability since 2012, according to Chatterjee’s associate cited above.

Mitsubishi Chemical Corp. said in a statement that the shares to be sold to TCG are valued at $48 million, but TCG did not mention the price in its media release. The cost of acquisition could go up, depending on the performance of MCC PTA, said Chatterjee’s associate.

Asked if HPL’s assets are to be leveraged for the transaction, he said, “Not immediately.” He refused to elaborate. The deal envisages infusion of funds to pay off MCC PTA’s debts, according to TCG’s statement.

By Soumonty Kanungo

Source: LiveMint

comments closed

Related News

September 25, 2022

France and Sweden both launch ‘first of a kind’ hydrogen facilities

Chemical Value Chain

France has launched an offshore green hydrogen production platform at the country’s Port of Saint-Nazaire this week, along with its first offshore wind farm. The hydrogen plant, which its operators say is the world’s first facility of its type, coincides with the launch of another “first of its kind” facility in Sweden dedicated to storing hydrogen in an underground lined rock cavern (LRC).

September 25, 2022

NextChem announces €194-million grant for waste-to-hydrogen project in Rome

Chemical Value Chain

The project sets up the Hydrogen Valley in Rome, the first industrial-scale technological hub for the development of the national supply chain for the production, transport, storage and use of hydrogen for the decarbonization of industrial processes and for sustainable mobility.

September 25, 2022

The problem with hydrogen

Chemical Value Chain

At first glance, hydrogen seems to be the perfect solution to our energy needs. It doesn’t produce any carbon dioxide when used. It can store energy for long periods of time. It doesn’t leave behind hazardous waste materials, like nuclear does. And it doesn’t require large swathes of land to be flooded, like hydroelectricity. Seems too good to be true. So…what’s the catch?