Think that you have to be a great talker to be a great manager? According to four legendary tech CEOs, the best managers share this surprising, overlooked skill.
The exemplary manager is often shown as the outgoing guy that gives his team pep talks and high fives. He’s a fast-talking genius and a smooth operator. In reality, though, that stereotype couldn’t be farther from the truth.
To four highly effective, seasoned, and successful tech executives, being a good talker isn’t just overvalued, it can actually be detrimental. Instead, there’s a subtle, often-overlooked ability that’s one of the most vital skills you can have as a manager–the ability to write.
“Written communication to engineering is superior [to verbal communication] because it is more consistent across an entire product team, it is more lasting, it raises accountability.”
– Ben Horowitz, Andreessen Horowitz
When managers write, you create work product–white papers, product requirement documents, FAQs, presentations–that lasts and is accessible to everyone in the organization. From marketing to sales to QA to engineering, everyone has a document off which they can work and consult.
The upshot of writing it down is that the manager takes public responsibility for what happens when the rest of the team executes on the point of view taken by the documents. That ratchets up accountability throughout the entire organization.
To Horowitz, the distinction between written and verbal communication is stark and, in fact, it’s what separates bad managers from the good ones. Good managers want to be held accountable and aren’t looking for ways to weasel out of responsibility. And so, good managers write, while “[b]ad product managers voice their opinion verbally and lament … the ‘powers that be’.”
“When I’m interviewing people, I like to give them a writing test. . . . Many people can pretend to be something they’re not in person, but very few people can do so in writing.”
– Phil Libin, Evernote
The importance of writing over talking is the reason why Phil Libin, founder and CEO of Evernote, makes the ability to write an essential qualification during the hiring process. He’ll only hire people who can write. In lieu of a lengthy verbal interview, Libin asks candidates to stop talking and “write a few paragraphs in normal English.”
The exercise shows Libin whether candidates can communicate using the written word, but Libin had an additional insight–that writing gets closer to revealing the candidate’s true personality.
“I find that you can tell a lot more about a person’s personality from a few paragraphs of their writing than from a lengthy verbal interview,” Libin said. That’s because when it comes to talking, the presentation makes a big difference–however, with writing, it’s just words on a page, which approaches pure thought.
“There is no way to write a six-page, narratively structured memo and not have clear thinking.”
– Jeff Bezos, Amazon
Jeff Bezos values writing over talking to such an extreme that in Amazon senior executive meetings, “before any conversation or discussion begins, everyone sits for 30 minutes in total silence, carefully reading six-page printed memos.”
That’s because, to Bezos, just talking and going through bullet points in a PowerPoint presentation concealed lazy thinking. It’s easy to jump from one bullet point to the next without having expressed a complete thought. “I don’t want this place to become a country club,” Bezos said, as he pushed his team to eschew intellectual laziness and think more deeply.
Writing out full sentences enforces clear thinking, but more than that, it’s a compelling method to drive memo authors to write in a narrative structure that reinforces a distinctly Amazon way of thinking–its obsession with the customer. In every memo that could potentially address any issue in the company, the memo author must answer the question: “What’s in it for the customer, the company, and how does the answer to the question enable innovation on behalf of the customer?”
“Reports are more a medium of self-discipline than a way to communicate information.”
-Andy Grove, Intel
Like Bezos, Grove finds value in the process of writing. The surprising thing, then, is that reading what’s written isn’t as important to Grove.
When you talk, there are often “ad hoc inputs,” meaning whatever pops into your head often comes out of your mouth. When managers write, you question those inputs and that reflection drives you to make better decisions.
That’s why the main point of writing is to force yourself “to be more precise than [you] might be verbally.” That self-imposed precision, according to Grove, is a “safety-net” for your thought process that you should always be doing to “catch . . . anything you may have missed.”
Accountability, coherence of thought and planning, and commitment to vision and mission are amazing benefits of what too many consider a ho-hum, even old-fashioned, tool.
By Walter Chen
All senior leaders taking new roles need to develop and implement a strategy to reinforce or reshape their leadership brand starting well before their official “Day One.” The author offers steps leaders can take to make sure they are starting off on the right foot.
What if a company built each component of its product from scratch with every order, without any standardized or consistent parts, processes, and quality-assurance protocols? Chances are that any CEO would view such an approach as a major red flag preventing economies of scale and introducing unacceptable levels of risk—and would seek to address it immediately. Yet every day this is how many organizations approach the development and management of artificial intelligence (AI) and analytics in general.
Rising polarization is unlikely to disappear anytime soon, and it can have severe ramifications for businesses, whether they take a public stance or not. However, by taking a selective and strategic approach, CEOs can reduce the harm of polarization first within their own companies.